linux: 4.4.0-78.99 -proposed tracker

Bug #1686645 reported by Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Taihsiang Ho
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-security
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Beattie
Upload-to-ppa
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Xenial
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the <version to be filled> upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
phase: Released
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-xenial
tags: added: xenial
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
tags: added: kernel-sru-cycle-2017.04.25-1
tags: added: kernel-sru-master-kernel
summary: - linux: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker
+ linux: 4.4.0-78.99 -proposed tracker
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: block-proposed
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Stefan Bader (smb)
tags: added: kernel-block
Andy Whitcroft (apw)
tags: removed: kernel-block
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : daedalus (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : daedalus (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : daedalus (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : daedalus (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : daedalus (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
68 comments hidden view all 148 comments
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel01 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 14, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : starmie-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : starmie-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 9, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : starmie-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : starmie-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 9, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : starmie-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : starmie-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : michael (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : starmie-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : starmie-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : starmie-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel01 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel01 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel01 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 15, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Kleber Sacilotto de Souza (kleber-souza) wrote :

Regression tests completed successfully.

Issues to note:

=== xenial 4.4.0-78.99 - generic ===

* amd64
- monotonic_time: failed on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_lxc: failed on some systems, not a regression.
- xfstests: fails for btrfs and xfs, passes for ext4. Not a regression.

* arm64
- rtc: failed on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_qrt_apparmor: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_zfs_xfs_generic: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.
- hwclock: failed on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests: failed on some systems, not a regression.

* s390x (Ubuntu on LPAR)
- aio_dio_bugs: failed as before, not a regression.
- libhugetlbfs: failed as before, not a regression.
- scrashme: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_blktrace_smoke_test: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_ecryptfs: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_seccomp: build error.

* s390x (zKVM)
- aio_dio_bugs: failed as before, not a regression.
- libhugetlbfs: failed as before, not a regression.
- scrashme: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_blktrace_smoke_test: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_ecryptfs: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_lxc: failed with "too many open files".
- ubuntu_seccomp: build error.

* s390x (zVM)
- aio_dio_bugs: failed as before, not a regression.
- libhugetlbfs: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_fan_smoke_test: failed as before, not a regression.
- scrashme: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_ecryptfs: something failed from .miscdev-bad-count.sh.xfs test all the way to namelen.sh.xfs test. This failed before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_lxc: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_seccomp: failed as before, not a regression.

=== xenial 4.4.0-78.99 - lowlatency ===

* amd64
- monotonic_time: fails on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_lxc: fails on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests: some testcases fail, not a regression.
- xfstests: fails for btrfs and xfs, passes for ext4. Not a regression.

tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

Hardware Certification have completed testing this -proposed kernel. No regressions were observed, results are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/xenial/4.4.0-78.99/xenial-proposed-published.html

tags: added: certification-testing-passed
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: removed: block-proposed-xenial
tags: removed: block-proposed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :
Download full text (6.9 KiB)

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.4.0-78.99

---------------
linux (4.4.0-78.99) xenial; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.4.0-78.99 -proposed tracker (LP: #1686645)

  * Please backport fix to reference leak in cgroup blkio throttle
    (LP: #1683976)
    - block: fix module reference leak on put_disk() call for cgroups throttle

  * UbuntuKVM guest crashed while running I/O stress test with Ubuntu kernel
    4.4.0-47-generic (LP: #1659111)
    - block: Unhash block device inodes on gendisk destruction
    - block: Use pointer to backing_dev_info from request_queue
    - block: Dynamically allocate and refcount backing_dev_info
    - block: Make blk_get_backing_dev_info() safe without open bdev
    - block: Get rid of blk_get_backing_dev_info()
    - block: Move bdev_unhash_inode() after invalidate_partition()
    - block: Unhash also block device inode for the whole device
    - block: Revalidate i_bdev reference in bd_aquire()
    - block: Initialize bd_bdi on inode initialization
    - block: Move bdi_unregister() to del_gendisk()
    - block: Allow bdi re-registration
    - bdi: Fix use-after-free in wb_congested_put()
    - block: Make del_gendisk() safer for disks without queues
    - block: Fix bdi assignment to bdev inode when racing with disk delete
    - bdi: Mark congested->bdi as internal
    - bdi: Make wb->bdi a proper reference
    - bdi: Unify bdi->wb_list handling for root wb_writeback
    - bdi: Shutdown writeback on all cgwbs in cgwb_bdi_destroy()
    - bdi: Do not wait for cgwbs release in bdi_unregister()
    - bdi: Rename cgwb_bdi_destroy() to cgwb_bdi_unregister()
    - block: Fix oops in locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list()
    - kobject: Export kobject_get_unless_zero()
    - block: Fix oops scsi_disk_get()

  * Touchpad not working correctly after kernel upgrade (LP: #1662589)
    - Input: ALPS - fix V8+ protocol handling (73 03 28)

  * Xenial update to v4.4.62 stable release (LP: #1683728)
    - drm/i915: Avoid tweaking evaluation thresholds on Baytrail v3
    - drm/i915: Stop using RP_DOWN_EI on Baytrail
    - usb: dwc3: gadget: delay unmap of bounced requests
    - mtd: bcm47xxpart: fix parsing first block after aligned TRX
    - MIPS: Introduce irq_stack
    - MIPS: Stack unwinding while on IRQ stack
    - MIPS: Only change $28 to thread_info if coming from user mode
    - MIPS: Switch to the irq_stack in interrupts
    - MIPS: Select HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK
    - MIPS: IRQ Stack: Fix erroneous jal to plat_irq_dispatch
    - crypto: caam - fix RNG deinstantiation error checking
    - Linux 4.4.62

  * ifup service of network device stay active after driver stop (LP: #1672144)
    - net: use net->count to check whether a netns is alive or not

  * [Hyper-V] mkfs regression in kernel 4.4+ (LP: #1682215)
    - block: relax check on sg gap

  * [Feature] KBL: intel_powerclamp driver support (LP: #1591641)
    - thermal/powerclamp: remove cpu whitelist
    - thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check
    - thermal/powerclamp: add back module device table

  * sysfs channel reads of lps22hb pressure sensor are stale (LP: #1682103)
    - iio: st_pressure: initialize lps22hb bootime

  * Backlight control does no...

Read more...

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
description: updated
description: updated
Displaying first 40 and last 40 comments. View all 148 comments or add a comment.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.