linux: 4.8.0-51.54 -proposed tracker

Bug #1686070 reported by Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
20
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Invalid
Medium
Taihsiang Ho
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-security
Invalid
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Langasek
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Po-Hsu Lin
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Beattie
Upload-to-ppa
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Yakkety
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the 4.8.0-51.54 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
phase: Released
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-yakkety
tags: added: yakkety
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
tags: added: kernel-sru-cycle-2017.04.04-5
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: block-proposed
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 5, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 5, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 9, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 37, failed: 5
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 37, failed: 5
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp4 (s390x.LPAR) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel02 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp6g002 (s390x.zKVM) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp4 (s390x.LPAR) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp6g002 (s390x.zKVM) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel02 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 10, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp6g002 (s390x.zKVM) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel02 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp6g002 (s390x.zKVM) - tests ran: 3, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel02 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 3, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp6g002 (s390x.zKVM) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel02 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp6g002 (s390x.zKVM) - tests ran: 15, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel02 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 15, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp6g002 (s390x.zKVM) - tests ran: 141, failed: 28
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp6g002 (s390x.zKVM) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp6g002 (s390x.zKVM) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel02 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 141, failed: 28
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel02 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : kernel02 (s390x.zVM) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp4 (s390x.LPAR) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp4 (s390x.LPAR) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp4 (s390x.LPAR) - tests ran: 3, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp4 (s390x.LPAR) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp4 (s390x.LPAR) - tests ran: 141, failed: 28
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp4 (s390x.LPAR) - tests ran: 15, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : s2lp4 (s390x.LPAR) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :

Respin, no need for Cert. testing

tags: added: regression-testing-passed
tags: removed: block-proposed-yakkety
tags: removed: block-proposed
Revision history for this message
Steve Beattie (sbeattie) wrote :

Needs to be copied to the yakkety security pocket.

Revision history for this message
Steve Beattie (sbeattie) wrote :

Sorry, I mis-read the git commit history for this kernel, it does NOT need to go to the yakkety-security pocket. I am unable to change the status of the security-signoff task to Invalid.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.8.0-51.54

---------------
linux (4.8.0-51.54) yakkety; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.8.0-51.54 -proposed tracker (LP: #1686070)

  * [Hyper-V][SAUCE] pci-hyperv: Use only 16 bit integer for PCI domain
    (LP: #1684971)
    - SAUCE: pci-hyperv: Use only 16 bit integer for PCI domain

linux (4.8.0-50.53) yakkety; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.8.0-50.53 -proposed tracker (LP: #1685847)

  * ubuntu 4.8 kernel, virtio_net error causes NAT packets to be lost
    (LP: #1683947)
    - virtio_net: Simplify call sites for virtio_net_hdr_{from, to}_skb().
    - virtio: don't set VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID on xmit
    - virtio-net: restore VIRTIO_HDR_F_DATA_VALID on receiving

 -- Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <email address hidden> Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:08:56 +0200

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Yakkety):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.