page allocation failure caused by rtl8139 driver
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
linux (Ubuntu) |
Expired
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
This is 32 bit Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy) running on a desktop machine with a realtek ethernet NIC:
02:03.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/
Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Unknown device 254c
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 64 (8000ns min, 16000ns max)
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
Region 0: I/O ports at de00 [size=256]
Region 1: Memory at fddff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
The problem: time-to-time I had messages in kernel log starting with line 'swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020'
This bug seems to be similar to #150611 but in my case it seems to be ralted to rtl8139 ...
LGB [Gábor Lénárt] (lgb) wrote : | #1 |
LGB [Gábor Lénárt] (lgb) wrote : | #2 |
Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote : | #3 |
Changed in linux: | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → Incomplete |
Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote : | #4 |
This bug report is remaining open against the actively developed kernel however against linux-source-2.6.22 this bug does not meet the criteria for a stable release update and is being closed. You can learn more about the stable release update process at https:/
Changed in linux-source-2.6.22: | |
status: | New → Won't Fix |
LGB [Gábor Lénárt] (lgb) wrote : | #5 |
Ok, I'll try (now there's even 2.6.24-4 if I'm right) however since I don't know what trigger the problem exactly, I don't know how I can sure that the problem is solved by 2.6.24-4 kernel or not.
Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote : | #6 |
Hi LGB,
I just wanted to let you know that you can download and try the new Hardy Heron Alpha release from http://
LGB [Gábor Lénárt] (lgb) wrote : | #7 |
I'm using hardy for some time, and I haven't got this issue yet, but since this problem didn't occure very often (and I don't know how to trigger) with kernel of gutsy neither, I can't say that it's fixed in hardy though ...
Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote : | #8 |
Hi LGB,
Thanks for the update. It sounds like a good sign that you have not ran into this while running Hardy. I'll go ahead and leave this report open for a while longer before we close it. If you are able to reproduce the issue, definitely let us know. Thanks!
LGB [Gábor Lénárt] (lgb) wrote : | #9 |
I think I have a similar issue now with 2.6.24, check bug #150611 , thanks!
Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote : | #10 |
The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release. As a result, the kernel team would appreciate it if you could please test this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel. There are one of two ways you should be able to test:
1) If you are comfortable installing packages on your own, the linux-image-
--or--
2) The upcoming Alpha5 for Intrepid Ibex 8.10 will contain this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel. Alpha5 is set to be released Thursday Sept 4. Please watch http://
Please let us know immediately if this newer 2.6.27 kernel resolves the bug reported here or if the issue remains. More importantly, please open a new bug report for each new bug/regression introduced by the 2.6.27 kernel and tag the bug report with 'linux-2.6.27'. Also, please specifically note if the issue does or does not appear in the 2.6.26 kernel. Thanks again, we really appreicate your help and feedback.
LGB [Gábor Lénárt] (lgb) wrote : | #11 |
I have this bug with 2.6.27-10-generic ( 2.6.27-10.20) using Ubuntu intrepid on 32 bit arch.
lgb@vega:~$ uname -a
Linux vega 2.6.27-10-generic #1 SMP Fri Nov 21 12:00:22 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455435] swapper: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x4020
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455449] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: P 2.6.27-10-generic #1
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455455] [<c037c9f6>] ? printk+0x1d/0x1f
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455470] [<c018a447>] __alloc_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455479] [<c01aafc5>] alloc_slab_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455486] [<c01ab6da>] new_slab+0x5a/0x1e0
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455491] [<c01ac86d>] ? unfreeze_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455496] [<c01acae5>] __slab_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455501] [<c01ad821>] __kmalloc_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455506] [<c02ec071>] ? dev_alloc_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455514] [<c02ec071>] ? dev_alloc_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455523] [<c02ebdb2>] __alloc_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455527] [<c02ec071>] dev_alloc_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455554] [<f8938791>] rtl8139_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455566] [<c014b22b>] ? hrtimer_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455577] [<f89390d6>] rtl8139_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455587] [<f8938f84>] ? rtl8139_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455596] [<c02f4e15>] net_rx_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455602] [<c0137672>] __do_softirq+
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455607] [<c013775d>] do_softirq+
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455611] [<c01378d5>] irq_exit+0x55/0x90
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455615] [<c0106c1a>] do_IRQ+0x4a/0x80
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455620] [<c013790c>] ? irq_exit+0x8c/0x90
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455624] [<c0113f8d>] ? smp_apic_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455631] [<c0105003>] common_
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455635] [<c010acca>] ? mwait_idle+
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455640] [<c010288d>] cpu_idle+0x7d/0x140
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455643] [<c036f3c3>] rest_init+0x53/0x60
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455650] =======
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455652] Mem-Info:
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455655] DMA per-cpu:
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455658] CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455660] CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455662] Normal per-cpu:
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455665] CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 118
Dec 7 12:03:05 vega kernel: [356296.455667] CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 174
D...
Changed in linux: | |
status: | Incomplete → Triaged |
Amit Kucheria (amitk) wrote : | #12 |
This bug was reported a while ago but there hasn't been any recent comments or updates. Is this still an issue with the latest pre-release of Jaunty 9.04? Refer to http://
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Triaged → Incomplete |
gna (nagy-gergely) wrote : | #13 |
Since Hardy is LTS, and i am sticked to OCFS version on 5 servers, i cannot test it on Jaunty, but i can confirm it on 2.6.24-24-server, as you see also with bnx2 network card. So i do not want see a statement like this: "Move away from LTS" because that would make me very sad.
Linux web2 2.6.24-24-server #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 16:36:01 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-24-server #1
[<c01785ab>] __alloc_
[<c02dbb89>] ip_local_
[<c0196226>] __slab_
[<c0197446>] __kmalloc_
[<c02b4d32>] __netdev_
[<c02b4d32>] __netdev_
[<c02b4125>] __alloc_
[<c02b4d32>] __netdev_
[<f89592c1>] bnx2_poll+
[<c012d974>] load_balance_
[<f8958c00>] bnx2_poll+
[<f8958e15>] bnx2_poll+
[<c014c024>] getnstimeofday+
[<c02bb7ed>] net_rx_
[<c01498f8>] ktime_get+0x18/0x40
[<c0136e42>] __do_softirq+
[<c0136f25>] do_softirq+
[<c013720d>] irq_exit+0x6d/0x80
[<c010a930>] do_IRQ+0x40/0x70
[<c014989e>] ktime_get_
[<c0108def>] common_
[<c01062e6>] mwait_idle_
[<c01066c3>] cpu_idle+0x73/0xd0
======
Mem-info:
DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: Hot: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 Cold: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: Hot: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 Cold: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Normal per-cpu:
CPU 0: Hot: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 176 Cold: hi: 62, btch: 15 usd: 57
CPU 1: Hot: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 149 Cold: hi: 62, btch: 15 usd: 50
HighMem per-cpu:
CPU 0: Hot: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 53 Cold: hi: 62, btch: 15 usd: 14
CPU 1: Hot: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 181 Cold: hi: 62, btch: 15 usd: 11
Active:486821 inactive:222382 dirty:1086 writeback:43 unstable:0 free:1236121 slab:125422 mapped:5242 pagetables:1068 bounce:0
DMA free:3508kB min:68kB low:84kB high:100kB active:4kB inactive:0kB present:16256kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 873 8874 8874
Normal free:122668kB min:3744kB low:4680kB high:5616kB active:85852kB inactive:111552kB present:894080kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 64008 64008
HighMem free:4818308kB min:512kB low:9096kB high:17684kB active:1861428kB inactive:777976kB present:8193024kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
DMA: 137*4kB 48*8kB 32*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3492kB
Normal: 30507*4kB 1*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 122628kB
HighMem: 6664*4kB 14962*8kB 19387*16kB 19951*32kB 10681*64kB 4402*128kB 1783*256kB 819*512kB 323*1024kB 200*2048kB 210*4096kB = 4818304kB
Swap cache: add 1, delete 0, find 0/0, race 0+0
Free swap = 1951884kB
Total swap = 1951888kB
Free swap: 1951884kB
2293759 pages of RAM
2064383 pages of HIGHMEM
216253 reserved pages
341800 pages shared
1 pages swap cached
1086 pages dirty
43 pages writeb...
Kaustubh (kaustubh-gadkari) wrote : | #14 |
I have Ubuntu 9.04 server installed, and I see this problem too:
[199458.249123] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28-11-server #42-Ubuntu
[199458.249126] Call Trace:
[199458.249128] <IRQ> [<ffffffff802b6
[199458.249144] [<ffffffff802df
[199458.249148] [<ffffffff802e0
[199458.249152] [<ffffffff802e1
[199458.249158] [<ffffffff805ac
[199458.249161] [<ffffffff802e2
[199458.249165] [<ffffffff805ac
[199458.249168] [<ffffffff805ac
[199458.249172] [<ffffffff805ac
[199458.249186] [<ffffffffa0082
[199458.249191] [<ffffffff805dd
[199458.249198] [<ffffffffa0085
[199458.249202] [<ffffffff805ac
[199458.249208] [<ffffffffa0083
[199458.249214] [<ffffffff80227
[199458.249220] [<ffffffffa0085
Ike Panhc (ikepanhc) wrote : | #15 |
Hi Kaustubh,
I saw the dmesg you post, but it seems you are using broadcom ethernet card (bnx2)
Could you confirm that?
Blacknight (michael-blacknight) wrote : | #16 |
Hi all,
my, well lets call my little homeserver (a fit-pc2), just nearly died on me.
Commands like ps -aux wouldn't complete, they just stopped halfway through.
i found this in my logs.
Jul 30 20:50:21 home kernel: [118560.183051] swapper: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x4020
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183069] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28-14-server #47-Ubuntu
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183079] Call Trace:
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183101] [<c050b3b6>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183119] [<c019bdc7>] __alloc_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183136] [<c01bf545>] alloc_slab_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183150] [<c01bfc45>] new_slab+0x55/0x1e0
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183164] [<c01c0d85>] ? unfreeze_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183177] [<c01c0fdd>] __slab_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183190] [<c01c1c49>] __kmalloc_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183205] [<c04373d3>] ? __netdev_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183218] [<c04373d3>] ? __netdev_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183231] [<c04370e9>] __alloc_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183243] [<c04373d3>] __netdev_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183277] [<f80a931d>] rtl8169_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183300] [<f80a97d0>] rtl8169_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183322] [<f80acf6b>] rtl8169_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183339] [<c04402cd>] net_rx_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183355] [<c01467f7>] __do_softirq+
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183368] [<c014692d>] do_softirq+
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183381] [<c0146aa5>] irq_exit+0x55/0x90
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183394] [<c010c1c3>] do_IRQ+0x83/0xa0
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183406] [<c0146adc>] ? irq_exit+0x8c/0x90
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183420] [<c011f8fb>] ? smp_apic_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183433] [<c010ab13>] common_
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183447] [<c0110a12>] ? mwait_idle+
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183461] [<c010884d>] cpu_idle+0x6d/0xd0
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183473] [<c04fb1de>] rest_init+0x4e/0x60
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183482] Mem-Info:
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183488] DMA per-cpu:
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183496] CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183505] CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183512] Normal per-cpu:
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183520] CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 47
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183529] CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 172
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.183537] HighMem per-cpu:
Jul 30 20:50:22 home kernel: [118560.18...
Keng-Yu Lin (lexical) wrote : | #17 |
Since napi has changed a lot in the newer version of linux kernel, would you please try the latest mainline build (available at http://
Marcus Blomenkamp (mblomenk) wrote : | #18 |
The problem is still present in Ubuntu 9.10. In my case the machine has 120MB of memory and 192MB of swap. Swap usage was about 10MB when the following happened during heavy network IO:
[ 2489.732639] swapper: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x4020
[ 2489.732659] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.31-
[ 2489.732668] Call Trace:
[ 2489.732696] [<c057481e>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a
[ 2489.732720] [<c01ba2c0>] __alloc_
[ 2489.732735] [<c01ba50f>] __alloc_
[ 2489.732754] [<c01e201a>] new_slab+
[ 2489.732769] [<c01e2fcf>] __slab_
[ 2489.732783] [<c01e3f6a>] __kmalloc_
[ 2489.732803] [<c0499c8e>] ? __netdev_
[ 2489.732815] [<c0499c8e>] ? __netdev_
[ 2489.732828] [<c049995d>] __alloc_
[ 2489.732840] [<c0499c8e>] __netdev_
[ 2489.732881] [<c8723a53>] rtl8139_
[ 2489.732901] [<c8723c45>] rtl8139_
[ 2489.732922] [<c0168f0d>] ? clocksource_
[ 2489.732941] [<c04a4a75>] net_rx_
[ 2489.732958] [<c87233e6>] ? rtl8139_
[ 2489.732978] [<c014cc40>] __do_softirq+
[ 2489.732998] [<c0128098>] ? default_
[ 2489.733013] [<c0576bda>] ? _spin_lock_
[ 2489.733032] [<c0106b92>] ? enable_
[ 2489.733044] [<c014cd8d>] do_softirq+
[ 2489.733056] [<c014cecd>] irq_exit+0x5d/0x70
[ 2489.733067] [<c0104f10>] do_IRQ+0x50/0xc0
[ 2489.733078] [<c014cec0>] ? irq_exit+0x50/0x70
[ 2489.733099] [<c011ddc7>] ? smp_apic_
[ 2489.733111] [<c01039b0>] common_
[ 2489.733124] [<c0127365>] ? native_
[ 2489.733136] [<c010a5b6>] default_
[ 2489.733148] [<c010202c>] cpu_idle+0x8c/0xd0
[ 2489.733170] [<c0564815>] rest_init+0x55/0x60
[ 2489.733182] [<c07958cd>] start_kernel+
[ 2489.733193] [<c0795406>] ? unknown_
[ 2489.733212] [<c079507c>] i386_start_
[ 2489.733220] Mem-Info:
[ 2489.733226] DMA per-cpu:
[ 2489.733234] CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
[ 2489.733241] Normal per-cpu:
[ 2489.733248] CPU 0: hi: 42, btch: 7 usd: 41
[ 2489.733262] Active_anon:370 active_file:13055 inactive_anon:468
[ 2489.733267] inactive_file:12624 unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
[ 2489.733272] free:236 slab:1936 mapped:4460 pagetables:398 bounce:0
[ 2489.733288] DMA free:496kB min:176kB low:220kB high:264kB active_anon:124kB inactive_anon:184kB active_file:3592kB inactive_
[ 2489.733301] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 109 109 109
[ 2489.733321] Normal free:448kB min:1252kB low:1564kB high:1876kB active_anon:1356kB inactive_
[ 2489.733334] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
[ 2489.733347] DMA: 124*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*3...
Mark Bergsma (mark-wikimedia) wrote : | #19 |
We are seeing this bug often with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS on most of our servers, with a variety of network cards/drivers (bnx2, tg3, etc).
Here is an example trace:
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548225] swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548231] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-25-server #1
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548233]
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548233] Call Trace:
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548235] <IRQ> [<ffffffff8028c
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548261] [<ffffffff802ae
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548266] [<ffffffff802af
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548269] [<ffffffff803eb
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548273] [<ffffffff803eb
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548276] [<ffffffff802b0
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548281] [<ffffffff803ea
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548285] [<ffffffff803eb
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548293] [<ffffffff880f1
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548300] [<ffffffff880fa
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548314] [<ffffffff803f2
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548319] [<ffffffff80244
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548323] [<ffffffff8020d
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548325] [<ffffffff8020e
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548327] [<ffffffff80244
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548329] [<ffffffff8020e
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548331] [<ffffffff8020b
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548333] [<ffffffff8020c
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548334] <EOI> [<ffffffff803dc
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548343] [<ffffffff8803c
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548348] [<ffffffff8803c
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548349] [<ffffffff8020b
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548352] [<ffffffff803db
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548354] [<ffffffff8020b
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548355] [<ffffffff803db
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548357] [<ffffffff8020b
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548361] [<ffffffff80632
Dec 28 00:43:42 brewster kernel: [5113787.548364] [<ffffffff806...
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Incomplete → New |
description: | updated |
Jeremy Foshee (jeremyfoshee) wrote : | #20 |
LGB [Gábor Lénárt],
Please verify if this issue exists in the latest build of Lucid so that we can triage and work the issue appropriately. I look forward to the results of your testing.
Thanks!
~JFo
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Incomplete |
LGB [Gábor Lénárt] (lgb) wrote : | #21 |
I haven't met with the problem yet, it seems ... At least I couldn't find anything similar in kernel logs ...
Oliver Leitner (shadow333) wrote : | #22 |
Problem still exists:
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743138] swapper: page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x4020
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743143] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: P 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743146] Call Trace:
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743148] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810f9
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743162] [<ffffffff810f9
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743168] [<ffffffff81131
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743172] [<ffffffff81136
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743178] [<ffffffff81453
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743182] [<ffffffff81452
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743186] [<ffffffff81453
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743193] [<ffffffffa0ba9
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743199] [<ffffffff8145d
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743217] [<ffffffff8145d
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743223] [<ffffffff81475
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743227] [<ffffffff81475
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743231] [<ffffffff8145a
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743236] [<ffffffff8106e
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743242] [<ffffffff81031
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743248] [<ffffffff81014
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743252] [<ffffffff81015
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743255] [<ffffffff8106e
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743260] [<ffffffff81545
May 1 09:32:11 localhost kernel: [36788.743264] [<ffffffff81013
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743266] <EOI> [<ffffffff8130d
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743276] [<ffffffff8130d
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743280] [<ffffffff8130d
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743285] [<ffffffff81543
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743291] [<ffffffff81437
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743297] [<ffffffff81011
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743301] [<ffffffff8153a
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743304] Mem-Info:
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743307] Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
May 1 09:32:12 localhost kernel: [36788.743311] CPU 0: hi: ...
madorc (orc-homesrv) wrote : | #23 |
02:05.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/
Network goes down (all another tasks works fine)...
Part of syslog in attachment...
Jeremy Foshee (jeremyfoshee) wrote : | #24 |
This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated comments for quite some time. As a result this bug is being closed. Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release http://
[This is an automated message. Apologies if it has reached you inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]
tags: | added: kj-expired |
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Incomplete → Expired |
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Expired → New |
Alex Tomlins (alex-tomlins) wrote : | #25 |
I've just hit this bug on Lucid
# uname -a
Linux arwen 2.6.32-29-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 11 20:52:10 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
kern.log attached.
This occurred while rsyncing a large amount of data over rsh.
DaMoGan (dmgdsm) wrote : | #26 |
I have likewise hit this on Lucid with latest patches:
Linux matrix 2.6.32-30-server #59-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 1 22:46:09 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Hardware is an IBM eServer Xseries 346 Model 8840U with two attached Infortrend Eonstor 24 bay RAID arrays, each hanging off an LSI22320-R. Attached is kern.log, lsmod and lspci -vvv.
I'm in a similar situation:
DaMoGan (dmgdsm) wrote : | #27 |
Oops, posted before I was finished:
I'm in a similar situation -- I'm rsyncing a bunch of stuff to the server I'm seeing the errors on.
Thanks.
DaMoGan (dmgdsm) wrote : | #28 |
Ok, this is weird -- I just now saw this same bug on an updated lucid system consisting of entirely different hardware -- looks like perhaps a bug was introduced in the last kernel update?
Linux nmrfs 2.6.32-30-server #59-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 1 22:46:09 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Hardware is a whitebox 1U server with attached 24 bay Area DNS-1400 JBOD SAS-SATA, hung off an LSI MegaRAID SAS 9280-8e.
Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) wrote : | #29 |
DaMoGan - please start a new bug using 'ubuntu-bug linux'
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Péter Molnár (empece) wrote : | #30 |
I have the same problem with 2.6.32-33-generic x86_64.
Josh (joshhansen) wrote : | #31 |
I'm getting something similar, but with the rtl8192 driver. I was connected to a wireless network but otherwise the computer was idle when this happened. The system dropped down to the text console and was completely unresponsive.
==Other information==
Thinkpad Edge E420
Ubuntu 11.04 x86_64
Home filesystem is encrypted and mounted on .Private
# uname -a
Linux ibuse 2.6.38-11-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 12 21:17:25 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
relevant kern.log output -> see attachment
# lspci -vvv
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family DRAM Controller (rev 09)
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 21e2
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 21e2
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 42
Region 0: Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4M]
Region 2: Memory at c0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Region 4: I/O ports at 5000 [size=64]
Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: i915
Kernel modules: i915
00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 04)
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 21e2
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
Region 0: Memory at d1605000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16]
Capabilities: <access denied>
00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 (rev 04) (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 21e2
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
Region 0: Memory at d160a000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 6 Series Chipset Family High Definition Audio Controller (rev 04)
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 21e2
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 43
Region 0: Memory at d1600000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Capabiliti...
jan (jan-ubuntu-h-i-s) wrote : | #32 |
I see the same behavior on an USB network stick.
Bus 002 Device 006: ID 050d:945a Belkin Components
I have added the error log from my lucid system
Linux 2.6.32-
It seems that memory management is broken, if this is related to the network driver is unclear to me.
The messages seem dangerous to me, as also other processes than the network driver are affected.
In all messages in my log (tens of them) a similar calling tree inside the network driver is shown.
jan (jan-ubuntu-h-i-s) wrote : | #33 |
Related to newer bug:
https:/
The links in that bug state that it is a kernel bug, and solution is known. When may it come to Lucid ?
penalvch (penalvch) wrote : | #34 |
LGB [Gábor Lénárt], this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are available from http://
If it remains an issue, could you run the following command in the development release from a Terminal (Applications-
apport-collect -p linux <replace-
Also, if you could test the latest upstream kernel available that would be great. It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Refer to https:/
If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following tag 'kernel-
If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the tag: 'kernel-
If you are unable to test the mainline kernel, for example it will not boot, please add the tag: 'kernel-
Please let us know your results. Thanks in advance.
tags: |
added: needs-upstream-testing removed: rtl8139 |
no longer affects: | linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) |
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → Incomplete |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #35 |
[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Incomplete → Expired |
The Hardy Heron kernel was recently uploaded for testing. We'd really appreciate it if you could try testing with this newer kernel and verify if this issue still exists. Unfortunately, the Hardy Heron Alpha1 LiveCD was released with the older 2.6.22 kernel. You'll have to manually install the newer Hardy Heron kernel in order to test. This should not be the case for Alpha2 which is set to come out around Dec 20. However, here are the instructions to install if you choose to do so, otherwise just wait for Alpha2 to come out:
1) edit the file /etc/apt/ sources. list and add the following line:
deb http:// archive. ubuntu. com/ubuntu hardy main restricted
2) sudo apt-get update 2.6.24- 1-generic
3) sudo apt-get install linux-image-
4) reboot and select the new kernel from the grub menu
After you've tested, please feel free to revert back - ie boot into the old kernel, sudo apt-get remove linux-image- 2.6.24- 1-generic, and remove the line from /etc/apt/ sources. list . Please update this report with your results. Thanks in advance!