linux: 3.2.0-103.143 -proposed tracker

Bug #1580658 reported by Kamal Mostafa
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Po-Hsu Lin
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Prepare-package-lbm
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-security
Fix Released
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Beattie
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned
Precise
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the 3.2.0-103.143 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

-- swm properties --
derivative-trackers-created: true
phase: Promoted to proposed
proposed-announcement-sent: true

CVE References

tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-precise
tags: added: precise
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Precise):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Packages available

Derivative packages from packages here can be worked on, the following tracking bugs were opened for them:
linux-ti-omap4 - bug 1580815
linux-armadaxp - bug 1580816

description: updated
Andy Whitcroft (apw)
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 12, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 12, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (amd64) - tests ran: 12, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 12, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 11, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 11, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (i386) - tests ran: 11, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 11, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Automated-Testing regression

Here's the relevant information:

 precise linux 3.2.0-103.143 REGR summary<REGR: 1 FAIL: 42 GOOD: 54>

Please verify test results in http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/status/adt-matrix/overall.txt

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (i386) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Steve Beattie (sbeattie) wrote :

USN needed

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 12, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 12, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 11, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 11, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 18, failed: 8
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 18, failed: 8
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 18, failed: 9
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 18, failed: 9
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (amd64) - tests ran: 12, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (i386) - tests ran: 11, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (amd64) - tests ran: 18, failed: 8
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (i386) - tests ran: 18, failed: 9
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dagmar (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.

Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

Hardware Certification have completed testing this -proposed kernel. No regressions were observed, results are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/precise/3.2.0-103.143/precise-proposed-frozen.html

tags: added: certification-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

Please note that we have shrink the test pool for Precise 3.2

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: qa-testing-passed
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
removed: qa-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.2.0-104.145

---------------
linux (3.2.0-104.145) precise; urgency=low

  [ Kamal Mostafa ]

  * CVE-2016-1583 (LP: #1588871)
    - SAUCE: proc: prevent stacking filesystems on top
    - ecryptfs: fix handling of directory opening
    - ecryptfs: don't reinvent the wheels, please - use struct completion
    - SAUCE: ecryptfs: forbid opening files without mmap handler

 -- Andy Whitcroft <email address hidden> Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:45:14 +0100

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Precise):
status: New → Fix Released
Adam Conrad (adconrad)
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.