Activity log for bug #1496073

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2015-09-15 17:58:49 Brad Figg bug added bug
2015-09-15 17:58:56 Brad Figg linux (Ubuntu): status New Triaged
2015-09-15 17:59:01 Brad Figg linux (Ubuntu): status Triaged In Progress
2015-09-15 17:59:04 Brad Figg linux (Ubuntu): assignee Brad Figg (brad-figg)
2015-09-15 18:02:51 Brad Figg description The seccomp regression tests are failing due to SRU kernels not having the relevant commit: Author: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Date: Tue Feb 17 13:48:00 2015 -0800 seccomp: cap SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO data to MAX_ERRNO The value resulting from the SECCOMP_RET_DATA mask could exceed MAX_ERRNO when setting errno during a SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO filter action. This makes sure we have a reliable value being set, so that an invalid errno will not be ignored by userspace. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reported-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> The seccomp regression tests are failing due to SRU kernels not having the relevant commit: Author: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Date: Tue Feb 17 13:48:00 2015 -0800     seccomp: cap SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO data to MAX_ERRNO     The value resulting from the SECCOMP_RET_DATA mask could exceed MAX_ERRNO     when setting errno during a SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO filter action. This makes     sure we have a reliable value being set, so that an invalid errno will not     be ignored by userspace.     Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>     Reported-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>     Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>     Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>     Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>     Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> SRU Justification Impact: Upstream regression tests are reporting errors. Test Case: Run the upstream regression tests and verify they are passing cleanly.
2015-09-15 19:08:39 Brad Figg linux (Ubuntu): status In Progress Fix Committed
2015-10-05 19:01:21 Brad Figg nominated for series Ubuntu Vivid
2015-10-05 19:01:21 Brad Figg bug task added linux (Ubuntu Vivid)
2015-10-05 19:01:34 Brad Figg linux (Ubuntu Vivid): status New Fix Committed
2015-10-05 19:01:39 Brad Figg linux (Ubuntu): status Fix Committed Invalid
2015-10-07 03:01:55 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/trusty-proposed/linux-lts-vivid
2015-10-08 14:49:19 Luis Henriques tags verification-needed-vivid
2015-10-12 15:04:42 Brad Figg tags verification-needed-vivid verification-done-vivid
2015-10-20 16:29:17 Launchpad Janitor linux (Ubuntu Vivid): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2015-10-20 16:29:17 Launchpad Janitor cve linked 2015-7312
2016-03-01 17:44:49 Brad Figg nominated for series Ubuntu Trusty
2016-03-01 17:44:49 Brad Figg bug task added linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
2016-03-01 17:45:17 Brad Figg bug task added linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu)
2016-03-01 17:45:24 Brad Figg bug task deleted linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Vivid)
2016-03-03 21:13:39 Kamal Mostafa linux (Ubuntu Trusty): status New Fix Committed
2016-03-03 21:56:04 Kamal Mostafa linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Trusty): status New Fix Committed
2016-03-21 14:54:58 Kamal Mostafa tags verification-done-vivid verification-done-vivid verification-needed-trusty
2016-03-28 14:58:01 Brad Figg tags verification-done-vivid verification-needed-trusty verification-done-trusty verification-done-vivid
2016-04-05 08:51:38 Launchpad Janitor linux (Ubuntu Trusty): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2016-04-05 08:51:37 Launchpad Janitor linux (Ubuntu Trusty): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2016-04-05 08:52:23 Launchpad Janitor linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Trusty): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2016-04-05 08:52:29 Launchpad Janitor linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Trusty): status Fix Committed Fix Released