Comment 49 for bug 190587

Thanks for the answer. Of course you are right, that 48h isn't that long for a just local exploit. And of course any comparison with MS is surely won by ubuntu :) I was just wondering why debian's updated kernel was so many hours before ubuntu's released. The places to patch the kernel-source should be exactly the same in both.

>> thus the time consumption to package and test if
>> any regressions appear is longer than for others.
Means that there is an all or nothing policy? So even if the i386-patch would have been created and tested it hadn't been released before the patches for generic- and 64bit-kernels had been created and released?

greets