Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I think de4x5 should be a driver of last resort. Tulip should always
> be preferred to drive a given piece of hardware. I wouldn't shed any
> tears if we stopped shipping de4x5 by default -- it's caused no end of
> problems on parisc and ia64.
OTOH it's the only module that can drive the ethernet card of my a500
(hppa).
--=20
see shy jo
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:09:43 -0500
From: Joey Hess <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: base: de4x5.ko generates endless loop of errors with phobos p430tx
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I think de4x5 should be a driver of last resort. Tulip should always
> be preferred to drive a given piece of hardware. I wouldn't shed any
> tears if we stopped shipping de4x5 by default -- it's caused no end of
> problems on parisc and ia64.
OTOH it's the only module that can drive the ethernet card of my a500
(hppa).
--=20
see shy jo
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
HehbQuO8RAmpyAJ 9ZWVocwRZVPpGC5 UrRtZaUW9FNjACf UNJR E/jeCH30=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCEOlnd8H
axyi5Fmt8MwJ7Ar
=0rEo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--u3/rZRmxL6Mmk K24--