| 2008-10-21 22:04:49 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2008-10-23 14:19:07 |
xteejx |
description |
Ubuntu Intrepid beta iso from main ubuntu donwload page.
Cannot install Intrepid, or Hardy for that matter.
Managed to install Intrepid through Wubi from Vista.
On bootup, the uspalsh screen stops after about 5-10%ish. I tried the ACPI problem boot option and the bootup halted at SATA drive detection.
I am using a Compaq Presario CQ50-110EM laptop and I have seen others with this problem, which has now regressed into Intrepid.
I am guessing that HP/Compaq have implemented some form of protection against installing any linux distro as I have tried others and tried several versions of *buntu.
I am unsure how to grab a log of the bootup for problem solving, but am an avid Ubuntu user and want to see it working on this laptop.
Thanks guys |
Ubuntu Intrepid beta iso from main ubuntu donwload page.
Cannot install Intrepid, or Hardy for that matter.
Managed to install Intrepid through Wubi from Vista.
On bootup, the uspalsh screen stops after about 5-10%ish. I tried the ACPI problem boot option and the bootup halted at SATA drive detection.
I am using a Compaq Presario CQ50-110EM laptop and I have seen others with this problem, which has now regressed into Intrepid.
I am guessing that HP/Compaq have implemented some form of protection against installing any linux distro as I have tried others and tried several versions of *buntu.
I am unsure how to grab a log of the bootup for problem solving, but am an avid Ubuntu user and want to see it working on this laptop.
Thanks guys
Addition : I have also tried the latest daily ISO 21st October, both the alternate and live versions, and neither work...BUT the alternate makes it as far as the installer and begins to partition the drive, but then fails. |
|
| 2008-10-31 01:42:50 |
xteejx |
description |
Ubuntu Intrepid beta iso from main ubuntu donwload page.
Cannot install Intrepid, or Hardy for that matter.
Managed to install Intrepid through Wubi from Vista.
On bootup, the uspalsh screen stops after about 5-10%ish. I tried the ACPI problem boot option and the bootup halted at SATA drive detection.
I am using a Compaq Presario CQ50-110EM laptop and I have seen others with this problem, which has now regressed into Intrepid.
I am guessing that HP/Compaq have implemented some form of protection against installing any linux distro as I have tried others and tried several versions of *buntu.
I am unsure how to grab a log of the bootup for problem solving, but am an avid Ubuntu user and want to see it working on this laptop.
Thanks guys
Addition : I have also tried the latest daily ISO 21st October, both the alternate and live versions, and neither work...BUT the alternate makes it as far as the installer and begins to partition the drive, but then fails. |
Ubuntu Intrepid beta iso from main ubuntu donwload page.
Cannot install Intrepid, or Hardy for that matter.
Managed to install Intrepid through Wubi from Vista.
On bootup, the uspalsh screen stops after about 5-10%ish. I tried the ACPI problem boot option and the bootup halted at SATA drive detection.
I am using a Compaq Presario CQ50-110EM laptop and I have seen others with this problem, which has now regressed into Intrepid.
I am guessing that HP/Compaq have implemented some form of protection against installing any linux distro as I have tried others and tried several versions of *buntu.
I am unsure how to grab a log of the bootup for problem solving, but am an avid Ubuntu user and want to see it working on this laptop.
Thanks guys
Addition : I have also tried the latest daily ISO 21st October, both the alternate and live versions, and neither work...BUT the alternate makes it as far as the installer and begins to partition the drive, but then fails.
Update: Have tried the final release of Intrepid same problem. I managed to take a quick camera shot of the last thing it showed before the kernel halted on live cd bootup:
pci_match_id+0x9/0xa0
pci_device_probe+0xe0/0x140
sysfs_create_link+0x13/0x20
really_probe+0x72/0x1a0
driver_probe_device+0x50/0x60
__driver_attach+0x8b/0x90
__driver_attach+0x0/0x90
bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xa0
kmem_cache_alloc+0x8b/0xd0
init_ath_pci+0x0/0x66 [ath_pci]
driver_attach+0x21/0x30
bus_add_driver+0x1f8/0x270
init_ath_pci+0x0/0x66 [ath_pci]
driver_register+0x75/0x170
__pci_register_driver+0x72/0xc0
init_ath_pci+0x0/0x66 [ath_pci]
init_ath_pci+0x3f/0x66 [ath_pci]
do_one_initcall+0x41/0x170
__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x21/0x90
sys_init_module+0xb5/0x1f0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
------[end trace]-----
I don't see the point putting the CPU cycle times on the left bit in it didn't seem relevant.
Any help on this problem at all, or if anyone else has this same laptop and can confirm (or not) this problem. |
|
| 2008-11-01 13:06:03 |
xteejx |
title |
[intrepid beta] SATA drive unable to identify |
[intrepid] Compaq Presario CQ50 cannot install/boot |
|
| 2008-11-01 13:10:13 |
xteejx |
description |
Ubuntu Intrepid beta iso from main ubuntu donwload page.
Cannot install Intrepid, or Hardy for that matter.
Managed to install Intrepid through Wubi from Vista.
On bootup, the uspalsh screen stops after about 5-10%ish. I tried the ACPI problem boot option and the bootup halted at SATA drive detection.
I am using a Compaq Presario CQ50-110EM laptop and I have seen others with this problem, which has now regressed into Intrepid.
I am guessing that HP/Compaq have implemented some form of protection against installing any linux distro as I have tried others and tried several versions of *buntu.
I am unsure how to grab a log of the bootup for problem solving, but am an avid Ubuntu user and want to see it working on this laptop.
Thanks guys
Addition : I have also tried the latest daily ISO 21st October, both the alternate and live versions, and neither work...BUT the alternate makes it as far as the installer and begins to partition the drive, but then fails.
Update: Have tried the final release of Intrepid same problem. I managed to take a quick camera shot of the last thing it showed before the kernel halted on live cd bootup:
pci_match_id+0x9/0xa0
pci_device_probe+0xe0/0x140
sysfs_create_link+0x13/0x20
really_probe+0x72/0x1a0
driver_probe_device+0x50/0x60
__driver_attach+0x8b/0x90
__driver_attach+0x0/0x90
bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xa0
kmem_cache_alloc+0x8b/0xd0
init_ath_pci+0x0/0x66 [ath_pci]
driver_attach+0x21/0x30
bus_add_driver+0x1f8/0x270
init_ath_pci+0x0/0x66 [ath_pci]
driver_register+0x75/0x170
__pci_register_driver+0x72/0xc0
init_ath_pci+0x0/0x66 [ath_pci]
init_ath_pci+0x3f/0x66 [ath_pci]
do_one_initcall+0x41/0x170
__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x21/0x90
sys_init_module+0xb5/0x1f0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
------[end trace]-----
I don't see the point putting the CPU cycle times on the left bit in it didn't seem relevant.
Any help on this problem at all, or if anyone else has this same laptop and can confirm (or not) this problem. |
Ubuntu Intrepid beta iso from main ubuntu donwload page.
Cannot install Intrepid, or Hardy for that matter.
Managed to install Intrepid through Wubi from Vista.
On bootup, the uspalsh screen stops after about 5-10%ish. I tried the ACPI problem boot option and the bootup halted at SATA drive detection.
I am using a Compaq Presario CQ50-110EM laptop and I have seen others with this problem, which has now regressed into Intrepid.
I am guessing that HP/Compaq have implemented some form of protection against installing any linux distro as I have tried others and tried several versions of *buntu.
I am unsure how to grab a log of the bootup for problem solving, but am an avid Ubuntu user and want to see it working on this laptop.
Thanks guys
Addition : I have also tried the latest daily ISO 21st October, both the alternate and live versions, and neither work...BUT the alternate makes it as far as the installer and begins to partition the drive, but then fails.
Update: Have tried the final release of Intrepid same problem. I managed to take a quick camera shot of the last thing it showed before the kernel halted on live cd bootup:
pci_match_id+0x9/0xa0
pci_device_probe+0xe0/0x140
sysfs_create_link+0x13/0x20
really_probe+0x72/0x1a0
driver_probe_device+0x50/0x60
__driver_attach+0x8b/0x90
__driver_attach+0x0/0x90
bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xa0
kmem_cache_alloc+0x8b/0xd0
init_ath_pci+0x0/0x66 [ath_pci]
driver_attach+0x21/0x30
bus_add_driver+0x1f8/0x270
init_ath_pci+0x0/0x66 [ath_pci]
driver_register+0x75/0x170
__pci_register_driver+0x72/0xc0
init_ath_pci+0x0/0x66 [ath_pci]
init_ath_pci+0x3f/0x66 [ath_pci]
do_one_initcall+0x41/0x170
__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x21/0x90
sys_init_module+0xb5/0x1f0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
------[end trace]-----
I don't see the point putting the CPU cycle times on the left bit in it didn't seem relevant.
I have Googled around and it doesn't seem to just be Ubuntu, on several forums the problems seem to be the Atheros drivers locking up the kernel, and also older SATA/AHCI drivers seem to cause issues with the drives in this laptop.
Any help on this problem at all, or if anyone else has this same laptop and can confirm (or not) this problem. |
|
| 2008-11-01 13:25:01 |
Dimitrios Symeonidis |
None: status |
New |
Incomplete |
|
| 2008-11-01 13:25:01 |
Dimitrios Symeonidis |
None: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
| 2008-11-01 16:06:15 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01191.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01191.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 18:44:06 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01193.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01193.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 19:52:02 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01194.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01194.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:02:48 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01195.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01195.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:03:42 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01196.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01196.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:05:10 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01197.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01197.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:06:13 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01198.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01198.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:06:53 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01199.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01199.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:08:00 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01200.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01200.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:08:40 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01201.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01201.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:10:07 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01202.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01202.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:10:58 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01203.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01203.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:12:19 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01204.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01204.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:13:34 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01205.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01205.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:15:06 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01206.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01206.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:15:45 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01207.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01207.JPG) |
| 2008-11-01 22:17:32 |
xteejx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01208.JPG' (C:\Users\Teej\Desktop\DSC01208.JPG) |
| 2008-11-02 12:17:01 |
xteejx |
None: status |
Incomplete |
Confirmed |
|
| 2008-11-02 14:51:06 |
Dimitrios Symeonidis |
None: bugtargetdisplayname |
Ubuntu |
linux (Ubuntu) |
|
| 2008-11-02 14:51:06 |
Dimitrios Symeonidis |
None: bugtargetname |
ubuntu |
linux (Ubuntu) |
|
| 2008-11-02 14:51:06 |
Dimitrios Symeonidis |
None: statusexplanation |
|
assigned to the linux source package, as indicated here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage
also, teej, you are not supposed to confirm your own bug reports. the confirmed state is correct, but don't do that in the future... |
|
| 2008-11-02 14:51:06 |
Dimitrios Symeonidis |
None: title |
Bug #287244 in Ubuntu: "[intrepid] Compaq Presario CQ50 cannot install/boot" |
Bug #287244 in linux (Ubuntu): "[intrepid] Compaq Presario CQ50 cannot install/boot" |
|
| 2008-11-02 17:10:03 |
Dimitrios Symeonidis |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'teej-lspci-nnv.txt' (teej-lspci-nnv) |
| 2008-11-02 17:30:27 |
Dimitrios Symeonidis |
linux: importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
| 2008-11-02 17:30:27 |
Dimitrios Symeonidis |
linux: statusexplanation |
assigned to the linux source package, as indicated here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage
also, teej, you are not supposed to confirm your own bug reports. the confirmed state is correct, but don't do that in the future... |
this stops users from booting the livecd, so marking as importance=high |
|
| 2008-11-17 21:47:46 |
Alex Valavanis |
linux: assignee |
|
ubuntu-core-dev |
|
| 2008-11-17 21:47:46 |
Alex Valavanis |
linux: bugtargetdisplayname |
linux (Ubuntu) |
linux-restricted-modules (Ubuntu) |
|
| 2008-11-17 21:47:46 |
Alex Valavanis |
linux: bugtargetname |
linux (Ubuntu) |
linux-restricted-modules (Ubuntu) |
|
| 2008-11-17 21:47:46 |
Alex Valavanis |
linux: statusexplanation |
this stops users from booting the livecd, so marking as importance=high |
Problem appears to be with ath_pci module, which is contained in linux-restricted-modules package. I'm not sure whether it's appropriate for me to assign it to the package maintainers - sorry if it wasn't, I'm new to this! |
|
| 2008-11-17 21:47:46 |
Alex Valavanis |
linux: title |
Bug #287244 in linux (Ubuntu): "[intrepid] Compaq Presario CQ50 cannot install/boot" |
Bug #287244 in linux-restricted-modules (Ubuntu): "[intrepid] Compaq Presario CQ50 cannot install/boot" |
|
| 2008-11-17 22:08:24 |
Matt Zimmerman |
linux-restricted-modules: assignee |
ubuntu-core-dev |
|
|
| 2008-11-17 22:08:24 |
Matt Zimmerman |
linux-restricted-modules: statusexplanation |
Problem appears to be with ath_pci module, which is contained in linux-restricted-modules package. I'm not sure whether it's appropriate for me to assign it to the package maintainers - sorry if it wasn't, I'm new to this! |
|
|
| 2009-01-08 16:11:49 |
John Pugh |
linux: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2009-01-08 16:11:49 |
John Pugh |
linux: statusexplanation |
|
Added to linux (Ubuntu) as well |
|
| 2009-01-26 15:40:40 |
Steve Langasek |
linux: status |
Confirmed |
Invalid |
|
| 2009-01-26 15:40:40 |
Steve Langasek |
linux: statusexplanation |
Added to linux (Ubuntu) as well |
|
|
| 2009-01-26 15:41:10 |
Steve Langasek |
linux-restricted-modules: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2009-01-26 15:41:10 |
Steve Langasek |
linux-restricted-modules: statusexplanation |
|
Marking as fixed, per feedback from Teej. Thanks for following through on this bug! |
|
