Activity log for bug #121096

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2007-06-18 22:45:48 dean bug added bug
2007-06-18 22:46:39 dean bug added subscriber Dell WW Linux Engineering Team
2007-06-18 22:46:52 dean bug added subscriber The Redfish Team
2007-06-19 12:20:50 Amit Bhutani bug assigned to redfish (upstream)
2007-06-19 12:21:05 Amit Bhutani bug added subscriber The Redfish Team
2007-06-19 22:11:53 Sitsofe Wheeler linux-meta: statusexplanation Punting from linux-meta -> linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 Bug #120943 addresses this for Gusty, however I suspect it is unlikely such an invasive change like this would be made for Feisty. In an ideal world you would "just" turn nvidia-glx-new into (which is currently 1,0-9755 series) into 100.14.09. However doing so WILL cause regressions and various issues on cards that currently work with with the 1,0-9755 driver. Introducing a fourth nvidia-glx package would be... tough... given that we are still seeing fallout from the creation of nvidia-glx-new (see Bug #105756 and Bug #98641 ). Trying to manage the migration path alone would be a headache.
2007-06-21 06:31:48 Sitsofe Wheeler bug added subscriber Jose De la Rosa
2007-06-25 23:03:51 Henrik Nilsen Omma bug added subscriber Canonical Distro QA
2007-06-26 10:59:38 Henrik Nilsen Omma bug added subscriber Canonical Ubuntu QA Team
2007-06-26 11:02:47 Henrik Nilsen Omma bug added subscriber Canonical Ubuntu QA Team
2007-06-26 13:14:45 Henrik Nilsen Omma linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20: status New In Progress
2007-06-26 13:14:45 Henrik Nilsen Omma linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20: statusexplanation Punting from linux-meta -> linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 Bug #120943 addresses this for Gusty, however I suspect it is unlikely such an invasive change like this would be made for Feisty. In an ideal world you would "just" turn nvidia-glx-new into (which is currently 1,0-9755 series) into 100.14.09. However doing so WILL cause regressions and various issues on cards that currently work with with the 1,0-9755 driver. Introducing a fourth nvidia-glx package would be... tough... given that we are still seeing fallout from the creation of nvidia-glx-new (see Bug #105756 and Bug #98641 ). Trying to manage the migration path alone would be a headache.
2007-07-05 20:06:37 Jose De la Rosa bug added attachment 'C:\tmp\xorg.conf' (/etc/X11/xorg.conf)
2007-07-05 20:07:27 Jose De la Rosa bug added attachment 'C:\tmp\Xorg.0.log' (/var/log/Xorg.0.log)
2007-08-27 15:56:56 Henrik Nilsen Omma marked as duplicate 120943
2007-09-09 17:48:42 Mantas Kriaučiūnas bug assigned to linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (Baltix)
2014-04-10 04:01:37 Timothy R. Chavez bug task deleted dell
2014-04-10 08:53:06 Timothy R. Chavez bug task deleted somerville