linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-10.46~lucid1 -proposed tracker

Bug #806586 reported by Andy Whitcroft
34
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Certification-testing
Invalid
Undecided
Canonical Hardware Certification
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Undecided
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Undecided
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Promote-to-security
Invalid
Undecided
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Undecided
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Undecided
C de-Avillez
Security-signoff
Invalid
Undecided
Kees Cook
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Undecided
Canonical Kernel Team
linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned
Lucid
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the 2.6.38-10.46~lucid1 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results releated to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

kernel-stable-Prepare-package-start: Tuesday, 06. July 2011 17:47 UTC
kernel-stable-Promote-to-updates-end: Tuesday, 19. July 2011 21:40 UTC

Andy Whitcroft (apw)
tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
Changed in linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu):
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
Andy Whitcroft (apw)
summary: - linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-10.44~lucid1 -proposed tracker
+ linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-10.46~lucid1 -proposed tracker
Andy Whitcroft (apw)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Steve Conklin (sconklin) wrote :

The archs which failed to build are not supported and can be ignored. The question of why they tried to build is being investigated.

Revision history for this message
Kees Cook (kees) wrote :

Since this is the first time the package will be in the Lucid archive, I am not counting it as a "security update". It should only go to the -updates pocket this time. Future uploads that include CVE fixes should go to -security normally, though.

Changed in linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Invalid
Revision history for this message
C de-Avillez (hggdh2) wrote :

On a AMD64 server install kernel-test-security reported 8 different failures. Bug 810807 has been opened. Although I am not yet tagging qa-testing-failed (all other archs/environments still to be tested), looking at the above bug now may gain us some time.

Kees Cook (kees)
Changed in linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu):
status: Invalid → In Progress
Revision history for this message
C de-Avillez (hggdh2) wrote :

OK. There was only one failure, dealing with the DEBUG_RODATA on Xen i386; per sconklin this is expected and already targeted to next build, so tagging qa-testing-passed.

tags: added: qa-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Brendan Donegan (brendan-donegan) wrote :

No certification testing is done on backports.

tags: added: natty
tags: removed: natty
tags: added: lucid
Martin Pitt (pitti)
Changed in linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package linux-lts-backport-natty - 2.6.38-10.46~lucid1

---------------
linux-lts-backport-natty (2.6.38-10.46~lucid1) lucid-proposed; urgency=low

  [Andy Whitcroft]

  * Release Tracking Bug
    - LP: #806586

  [ Upstream Kernel Changes ]

  * Revert "put stricter guards on queue dead checks"
  * Revert "fix oops in scsi_run_queue()"
 -- Steve Conklin <email address hidden> Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:36:29 +0100

Changed in linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Herton R. Krzesinski (herton) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.