linux-hwe: 4.8.0-42.45~16.04.1 -proposed tracker

Bug #1671408 reported by Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
20
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Hardware Certification
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Promote-to-security
Invalid
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Po-Hsu Lin
Security-signoff
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Security Team
Upload-to-ppa
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux-hwe (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Xenial
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the 4.8.0-42.45~16.04.1 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
kernel-stable-master-bug: 1671176
phase: Released
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-xenial
tags: added: xenial
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux-hwe (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: kernel-sru-cycle-2017.02.22-2
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : naumann (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : naumann (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : naumann (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : naumann (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 1
32 comments hidden view all 112 comments
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 2, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 64, failed: 64
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : alkaid (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

4.8.0-42.45~16.04.1 - generic
Regression test CMPL, looking good.
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/tracker-index.html

Issue to note in amd64:
  monotonic_time - gtod only failed on hainzel
  ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests - pku, svm, hyperv_clock failed on 3 nodes (extra smap on pepe), issue seen before, need to check why it's not fully tested on other nodes
  ubuntu_lxc - failed on secchi and archytas only
  ubuntu_zfs_xfs_generic - output mismatch on test 192, only for hainzel and secchi
  xfstests - two nodes passed, others failed with create-test-partitions

Issue to note in arm64:
  None (only tested with boot test)

Issue to note in i386:
  monotonic_time - gtod only failed on fozzie
  ubuntu_zfs_fstest - should be skipped
  ubuntu_zfs_xfs_generic - should be skipped

Issue to note in ppc64le:
  None

tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : naumann (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 3
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: removed: block-proposed-xenial
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :
Download full text (6.5 KiB)

This bug was fixed in the package linux-hwe - 4.8.0-42.45~16.04.1

---------------
linux-hwe (4.8.0-42.45~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=low

  * linux-hwe: 4.8.0-42.45~16.04.1 -proposed tracker (LP: #1671408)

  * Regression in 4.4.0-65-generic causes very frequent system crashes
    (LP: #1669611)
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: apparmor: fix lock ordering for mkdir"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: apparmor: fix leak on securityfs pin count"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: apparmor: fix reference count leak when
      securityfs_setup_d_inode() fails"
    - Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: apparmor: fix not handling error case when
      securityfs_pin_fs() fails"

  * NFS client : permission denied when trying to access subshare, since kernel
    4.4.0-31 (LP: #1649292)
    - fs: Better permission checking for submounts

  * shaking screen (LP: #1651981)
    - drm/radeon: drop verde dpm quirks

  * [0bda:0328] Card reader failed after S3 (LP: #1664809)
    - usb: hub: Wait for connection to be reestablished after port reset

  * linux-lts-xenial 4.4.0-63.84~14.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-lts-xenial
    4.4.0-63.84~14.04.2 (LP: #1664912)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: fix link auditing failure due to, uninitialized var

  * In Ubuntu 17.04 : after reboot getting message in console like Unable to
    open file: /etc/keys/x509_ima.der (-2) (LP: #1656908)
    - SAUCE: ima: Downgrade error to warning

  * 16.04.2: Extra patches for POWER9 (LP: #1664564)
    - powerpc/mm: Fix no execute fault handling on pre-POWER5
    - powerpc/mm: Fix spurrious segfaults on radix with autonuma

  * ibmvscsis: Add SGL LIMIT (LP: #1662551)
    - ibmvscsis: Add SGL limit

  * [Hyper-V] Bug fixes for storvsc (tagged queuing, error conditions)
    (LP: #1663687)
    - scsi: storvsc: Enable tracking of queue depth
    - scsi: storvsc: Remove the restriction on max segment size
    - scsi: storvsc: Enable multi-queue support
    - scsi: storvsc: use tagged SRB requests if supported by the device
    - scsi: storvsc: properly handle SRB_ERROR when sense message is present
    - scsi: storvsc: properly set residual data length on errors

  * Ubuntu16.10-KVM:Big configuration with multiple guests running SRIOV VFs
    caused KVM host hung and all KVM guests down. (LP: #1651248)
    - KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS cleanup: remove XICS_RM_REJECT
    - KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS: correct the real mode ICP rejecting counter
    - KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS: Fix potential issue with duplicate IRQ resends
    - KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS: Implement ICS P/Q states
    - KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS: Don't lock twice when checking for resend

  * ISST-LTE:pNV: ppc64_cpu command is hung w HDs, SSDs and NVMe (LP: #1662666)
    - blk-mq: Avoid memory reclaim when remapping queues
    - blk-mq: Fix failed allocation path when mapping queues
    - blk-mq: Always schedule hctx->next_cpu

  * systemd-udevd hung in blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait testing unpartitioned NVMe
    drive (LP: #1662673)
    - percpu-refcount: fix reference leak during percpu-atomic transition

  * [Yakkety SRU] Enable KEXEC support in ARM64 kernel (LP: #1662554)
    - [Config] Enable KEXEC support in ARM64.

  * [Hyper-V] Fix ring buffer handling to avoid host ...

Read more...

Changed in linux-hwe (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
description: updated
description: updated
Displaying first 40 and last 40 comments. View all 112 comments or add a comment.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.