Comment 1 for bug 14408

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

The disc which was included in Linux Magazine was an unofficial snapshot used
without consultating us, and because of this, it was labeled inappropriately.
It does not correspond to hoary-preview-install-i386 at all, and was derived
from a much older DVD image.

Since libatm1 is a very small package, I see no reason not to include it on
future CD images. It should appear in the next daily CD builds for all
architectures. (20050323)

My understanding is that libatm1 is suitable for use with the existing ppp and
speedtouch packages, and so it should not be necessary to include libatm1-dev.
Let me know if you still find it necessary.