Activity log for bug #36419
| Date | Who | What changed | Old value | New value | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-03-24 13:37:45 | seguso | bug | added bug | ||
| 2006-03-24 13:38:11 | seguso | libwnck: severity | Normal | Wishlist | |
| 2006-03-24 13:38:11 | seguso | libwnck: statusexplanation | |||
| 2006-03-31 10:49:41 | Sebastien Bacher | libwnck: status | Unconfirmed | Confirmed | |
| 2006-03-31 10:49:41 | Sebastien Bacher | libwnck: priority | Low | ||
| 2006-03-31 10:49:41 | Sebastien Bacher | libwnck: statusexplanation | Thanks for your bug. That's up to upstream to take that sort of decision, we will not implement that as a distribution specific change, I've forwarded it: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336716 | ||
| 2006-03-31 10:49:41 | Sebastien Bacher | libwnck: assignee | desktop-bugs | ||
| 2006-03-31 10:49:53 | Sebastien Bacher | bug | assigned to libwnck (upstream) | ||
| 2006-03-31 17:14:30 | Sebastien Bacher | libwnck: status | Confirmed | Fix Released | |
| 2006-03-31 17:14:30 | Sebastien Bacher | libwnck: statusexplanation | Thanks for your bug. That's up to upstream to take that sort of decision, we will not implement that as a distribution specific change, I've forwarded it: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336716 | Rejected by upstream with that comment: "This was considered before; bug 52225 comment 17 (well the link from there) explains why this is a bad idea. Also, the utterly braindead task grouping of the tasklist might cause more problems, but the main point against it is that link that Federico provided." Doing the same than upstream | |
| 2007-07-20 08:55:47 | Bug Watch Updater | libwnck: status | Invalid | Won't Fix | |
| 2010-09-16 02:15:53 | Bug Watch Updater | libwnck: importance | Unknown | Wishlist |
