Libreoffice 3.4 failed to upgrade to 3.5 because the pre-inst script was unable to remove /usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4 folder

Bug #916177 reported by Rigved Rakshit
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch)
Release: 12.04

libreoffice-base-core:
  Installed: 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2
  Candidate: 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 0
        500 http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Expected Outcome: Libreoffice 3.4 should upgraded cleanly to Libreoffice 3.5 using apt-get dist-upgrade.

Actual Outcome: Libreoffice 3.4 failed to upgrade to Libreoffice 3.5 because the pre-inst script was unable to remove /usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4 folder.
This is because the basis3.4 folder was not empty. It had one folder called program and a hidden file. By manually removing the contents of the basis3.4 folder and running apt-get dist-upgrade again, the upgrade process proceeded to completion.
Note: I only removed the contents of the basis3.4 folder, not the folder itself. Otherwise, the dpkg upgrade process got stuck again and complained that /usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4 did not exist, so cannot removed.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jan 14 00:21:12 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha i386 (20111215)
SourcePackage: libreoffice
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Rigved Rakshit (rigved) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Sam_ (and-sam) wrote :

Not a dupe of bug 804943 which is about Oneiric blcr kernel module.
Make it a dupe of Bug #915271

Revision history for this message
Rigved Rakshit (rigved) wrote :

This bug is possibly a duplicate of 916178, 916179 and 916181. But this is not a duplicate of bug 804943.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.