[Upstream] Writer Formula horizontal Spacing not honored

Bug #778979 reported by Darius Kulikauskas
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
LibreOffice
Confirmed
Low
libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: libreoffice

1) lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
Release: 11.04

2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
libreoffice-writer:
  Installed: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Candidate: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed/main i386
Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:

cd ~/Desktop && wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/778979/+attachment/2119391/+files/test.odt && lowriter -nologo test.odt

double click third icon down (theta with a superscript) -> click Format -> Spacing... -> change the Spacing combo box to 200% -> OK button and the spacing between the theta and the superscript should change.

4) What happens instead is it does not budge.

WORKAROUND: Add a space in the formula.

%itheta^{{" "}a}

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat May 7 13:40:08 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
SourcePackage: libreoffice
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-28 (8 days ago)

Revision history for this message
Darius Kulikauskas (dkulikauskas) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Darius Kulikauskas (dkulikauskas) wrote :

By the way, I am talking about mathematical formula tool in LibreOffice Writer.

Revision history for this message
penalvch (penalvch) wrote :

Darius Kulikauskas, thank you for reporting this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. One is able to edit the spacing of the border and index respectively via the Terminal:

cd ~/Desktop && wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/778979/+attachment/2118088/+files/test.odt && lowriter -nologo test.odt

Double click first icon -> click Format -> Spacing... -> change Category drop down to Border -> change Top combo box to 1.00mm -> OK button

Double click third icon -> click Format -> Spacing... -> change Category drop down to Indexes -> change Spacing combo box to 50% -> OK button

Does that work for you?

lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
Release: 11.04

apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
libreoffice-writer:
  Installed: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Candidate: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed/main i386
Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Darius Kulikauskas (dkulikauskas) wrote :

Thank you for the answer and useful tips. The solution works perfectly for circumflex, but the symbols in power still look awkward as they are only shifted in height but not in width. I've attached a screenshot of what the suggested settings helped me achieve with the test ODT file.

Is the settings causing circumflex invisible specific to my system or is it a default behavior? If it is default, I guess it should be altered so an average user would not have issues with iGreek symbols.

Symbols in power, in my opinion, still need some positioning fixing as they look awkward (and still even touches their base).

Revision history for this message
Darius Kulikauskas (dkulikauskas) wrote :

I also add the ODT file with altered settings.

Revision history for this message
In , penalvch (penalvch) wrote :

Created attachment 46484
test.odt

Downstream bug may be found at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/778979

1) lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
Release: 11.04

2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
libreoffice-writer:
  Installed: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Candidate: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed/main i386
Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:

cd ~/Desktop && wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/778979/+attachment/2119391/+files/test.odt && lowriter -nologo test.odt

double click third icon down (theta with a superscript) -> click Format -> Spacing... -> change the Spacing combo box to 200% -> OK button and the spacing between the theta and the superscript should change.

4) What happens instead is it does not budge.

WORKAROUND: Add a space in the formula.

%itheta^{{" "}a}

Revision history for this message
penalvch (penalvch) wrote :

Darius Kulikauskas, regarding the third icon down in test.odt, what is supposed to control the horizontal spacing between itheta and the superscript "a" is double click first icon -> click Format -> Spacing... -> change the Spacing combo box to 200% -> OK button. However, notice the two icons do not move apart at all from one another. Confirming this as a bug.

lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
Release: 11.04

apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
libreoffice-writer:
  Installed: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Candidate: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed/main i386
Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
In , penalvch (penalvch) wrote :

Created attachment 46484
test.odt

Downstream bug may be found at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/778979

1) lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
Release: 11.04

2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
libreoffice-writer:
  Installed: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Candidate: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed/main i386
Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:

cd ~/Desktop && wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/778979/+attachment/2119391/+files/test.odt && lowriter -nologo test.odt

double click third icon down (theta with a superscript) -> click Format -> Spacing... -> change the Spacing combo box to 200% -> OK button and the spacing between the theta and the superscript should change.

4) What happens instead is it does not budge.

WORKAROUND: Add a space in the formula.

%itheta^{{" "}a}

description: updated
tags: added: lo33
summary: - Italic Greek letters have problems being rendered with elements in power
- and circumflex
+ Writer Formula horizontal Spacing not honored
Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Changed in df-libreoffice:
importance: Unknown → Low
status: Unknown → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
In , Nopower (nopower) wrote :

same in OOo3.4beta

penalvch (penalvch)
summary: - Writer Formula horizontal Spacing not honored
+ [Upstream] Writer Formula horizontal Spacing not honored
Revision history for this message
In , Nopower (nopower) wrote :

same in OOo3.4beta

Revision history for this message
In , Björn Michaelsen (bjoern-michaelsen) wrote :

[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html

Revision history for this message
In , Björn Michaelsen (bjoern-michaelsen) wrote :

[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html

Changed in df-libreoffice:
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
In , penalvch (penalvch) wrote :

Reproducible in:
LOdev 3.5.0beta2
Build ID: 8589e48-760cc4d-f39cf3d-1b2857e-60db978
Microsoft Windows Vista Business 6.0.6002 Service Pack 2 Build 6002

Revision history for this message
In , penalvch (penalvch) wrote :

Reproducible in:
LOdev 3.5.0beta2
Build ID: 8589e48-760cc4d-f39cf3d-1b2857e-60db978
Microsoft Windows Vista Business 6.0.6002 Service Pack 2 Build 6002

Changed in df-libreoffice:
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
In , Owen-genat (owen-genat) wrote :

This bug has not seen an update in a while. Re-confirming that this issue still exists under GNU/Linux with TDF/LO v4.0.3.3 (Build ID: 0eaa50a932c8f2199a615e1eb30f7ac74279539) using either the test document from the description or a newly created document.

Revision history for this message
In , Owen-genat (owen-genat) wrote :

This bug has not seen an update in a while. Re-confirming that this issue still exists under GNU/Linux with TDF/LO v4.0.3.3 (Build ID: 0eaa50a932c8f2199a615e1eb30f7ac74279539) using either the test document from the description or a newly created document.

Revision history for this message
In , Owen-genat (owen-genat) wrote :

Created attachment 95876
Screenshot in v4.1.4.2 showing correct (expected) rendering.

This bug now appears to be fixed. Under Debian 7 / Crunchbang 11 (both x86_64) using:

- v4.1.4.2 Build ID: 0a0440ccc0227ad9829de5f46be37cfb6edcf72
- v4.2.0.4 Build ID: 05dceb5d363845f2cf968344d7adab8dcfb2ba71

... I see the formulas as in the attached (v4.2.0.4 renders the same a v4.1.4.2). This seems to correct the problem noted in the screenshot in the Launchpad bug (i.e., cropping and misplacement of the superscripts and diacritics):

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/778979/+attachment/2118091/+files/Screenshot.png

Can someone please test the originally provided example using a more recent build? Thanks.

Revision history for this message
In , Owen-genat (owen-genat) wrote :

Created attachment 95876
Screenshot in v4.1.4.2 showing correct (expected) rendering.

This bug now appears to be fixed. Under Debian 7 / Crunchbang 11 (both x86_64) using:

- v4.1.4.2 Build ID: 0a0440ccc0227ad9829de5f46be37cfb6edcf72
- v4.2.0.4 Build ID: 05dceb5d363845f2cf968344d7adab8dcfb2ba71

... I see the formulas as in the attached (v4.2.0.4 renders the same a v4.1.4.2). This seems to correct the problem noted in the screenshot in the Launchpad bug (i.e., cropping and misplacement of the superscripts and diacritics):

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/778979/+attachment/2118091/+files/Screenshot.png

Can someone please test the originally provided example using a more recent build? Thanks.

Revision history for this message
In , Owen-genat (owen-genat) wrote :

Summary edited for clarity.

Revision history for this message
In , Owen-genat (owen-genat) wrote :

Summary edited for clarity.

Revision history for this message
In , Owen-genat (owen-genat) wrote :

Created attachment 95877
Original Launchpad testcase.

(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 95876 [details]
> Screenshot in v4.1.4.2 showing correct (expected) rendering.
>
> This bug now appears to be fixed.

Please disregard my entire comment #5. It appears the original post in the freedesktop bugzilla has the edited (fixed) testcase attached and not the original (problematic) testcase. Creating the example formulas in a new document, exhibits the same issue i.e., diacritics above Greek characters being cropped, and superscript against Greek characters being misplaced. Similarly, opening the original Launchpad testcase in v4.1.4.2 and v4.2.0.4 still shows the problem.

I am attaching the original Launchpad testcase (and obsoleting the original freedesktop attachment) for clarity.

Revision history for this message
In , Owen-genat (owen-genat) wrote :

Created attachment 95877
Original Launchpad testcase.

(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 95876 [details]
> Screenshot in v4.1.4.2 showing correct (expected) rendering.
>
> This bug now appears to be fixed.

Please disregard my entire comment #5. It appears the original post in the freedesktop bugzilla has the edited (fixed) testcase attached and not the original (problematic) testcase. Creating the example formulas in a new document, exhibits the same issue i.e., diacritics above Greek characters being cropped, and superscript against Greek characters being misplaced. Similarly, opening the original Launchpad testcase in v4.1.4.2 and v4.2.0.4 still shows the problem.

I am attaching the original Launchpad testcase (and obsoleting the original freedesktop attachment) for clarity.

Revision history for this message
In , Beluga (beluga) wrote :

*** Bug 45461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
In , Beluga (beluga) wrote :

*** Bug 45461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
In , Qa-admin-q (qa-admin-q) wrote :

** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice
(5.1.5 or 5.2.1 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and
your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave
a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)

http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3
. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo";
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug-20160920

Revision history for this message
Marcus Tomlinson (marcustomlinson) wrote :

This release of Ubuntu is no longer receiving maintenance updates. If this is still an issue on a maintained version of Ubuntu please let us know.

Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Incomplete
Changed in df-libreoffice:
importance: Low → Unknown
status: Confirmed → Unknown
Changed in df-libreoffice:
importance: Unknown → Low
status: Unknown → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Marcus Tomlinson (marcustomlinson) wrote :

Synchronising bug status with upstream.

Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
In , Qa-admin-q (qa-admin-q) wrote :

Dear Christopher M. Penalver,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3
. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

Revision history for this message
In , Qa-admin-q (qa-admin-q) wrote :

Dear Christopher M. Penalver,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3
. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.