Activity log for bug #281053

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2008-10-10 01:54:24 JC Cheloven bug added bug
2008-10-10 01:54:24 JC Cheloven bug added attachment 'Dependencies.txt' (Dependencies.txt)
2008-10-13 16:32:31 Chris Cheney openoffice.org: status New Triaged
2008-10-13 16:32:31 Chris Cheney openoffice.org: importance Undecided Low
2008-10-13 16:32:31 Chris Cheney openoffice.org: statusexplanation
2008-10-13 16:32:48 Chris Cheney bug assigned to openoffice
2008-10-16 21:01:03 Chris Cheney openoffice: status New Unknown
2008-10-16 21:01:03 Chris Cheney openoffice: importance Undecided Unknown
2008-10-16 21:01:03 Chris Cheney openoffice: statusexplanation
2009-01-08 20:44:59 Bug Watch Updater openoffice: status Unknown In Progress
2010-05-13 22:02:26 Chris Cheney tags apport-bug apport-bug hardy
2011-05-31 05:04:35 penalvch bug task added libreoffice (Ubuntu)
2011-05-31 05:06:08 penalvch libreoffice (Ubuntu): status New Incomplete
2011-09-15 14:18:13 Björn Michaelsen openoffice.org (Ubuntu): status Triaged Won't Fix
2011-09-15 23:44:51 JC Cheloven bug task added df-libreoffice
2011-09-17 13:15:25 penalvch df-libreoffice: status New Incomplete
2011-09-17 15:02:24 JC Cheloven attachment added math_newline_issue.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/281053/+attachment/2417117/+files/math_newline_issue.tar.gz
2011-09-18 13:25:57 penalvch libreoffice (Ubuntu): status Incomplete New
2011-10-13 03:13:57 penalvch description Binary package hint: openoffice.org Using Ubuntu = 8.04; OOo = 1:2.4.1 The "newline" command is supposed to start a new line in your equation. Sometimes it doesn't work If "newline" is preceded or followed by some characters (as +, -, =, which are often needed), some error marks "¿" are obtained, and perhaps only a single line if displayed (it depends on the character and its relative position to "newline"). Examples : a+b_ij = newline = c+d # single line; error mark a+b_ij newline = c+d # two lines; missing "="; error mark a+b_ij newline + c+d # correct behaviour !! The "+" sign does fine after newline... a+b_ij + newline c+d # ... but not before: single line, error mark here a+b_ij = newline c+d # single line, error mark. The "=" sign does bad whether after or before newline Hope this helps to catch the bug. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 10 03:31:54 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: openoffice.org-core 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/lib/openoffice/program:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-rt i686 1) lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 11.10 Release: 11.10 2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer libreoffice-writer: Installed: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 Candidate: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status apt-cache policy libreoffice-math libreoffice-math: Installed: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 Candidate: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal: cd ~/Desktop && wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/281053/+attachment/2417117/+files/math_newline_issue.tar.gz && file-roller -h math_newline_issue.tar.gz && cd math_newline_issue && lowriter -nologo math_newline_issue.odt is no upside down question marks are presented in the Math formulas. 4) What happens is the upside down question marks are present erroneously due to "newline" command. If "newline" is preceded or followed by some characters (as +, -, =, which are often needed), some error marks "¿" are obtained, and perhaps only a single line if displayed (it depends on the character and its relative position to "newline"). Examples : a+b_ij = newline = c+d # single line; error mark a+b_ij newline = c+d # two lines; missing "="; error mark a+b_ij newline + c+d # correct behaviour !! The "+" sign does fine after newline... a+b_ij + newline c+d # ... but not before: single line, error mark here a+b_ij = newline c+d # single line, error mark. The "=" sign does bad whether after or before newline ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 10 03:31:54 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: openoffice.org-core 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron:  PATH=/usr/lib/openoffice/program:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games  LANG=es_ES.UTF-8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-rt i686
2011-10-13 03:14:10 penalvch libreoffice (Ubuntu): importance Undecided Medium
2011-10-13 03:14:10 penalvch libreoffice (Ubuntu): status New Triaged
2011-10-13 03:15:06 penalvch summary Math equation editor: "newline" fails sometimes Math equation editor: "newline" fails after symbols
2011-10-13 03:18:52 penalvch bug watch added http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41739
2011-10-13 03:18:52 penalvch df-libreoffice: importance Undecided Unknown
2011-10-13 03:18:52 penalvch df-libreoffice: status Incomplete Unknown
2011-10-13 03:18:52 penalvch df-libreoffice: remote watch freedesktop.org Bugzilla #41739
2011-10-13 03:19:16 penalvch summary Math equation editor: "newline" fails after symbols [Upstream] Math equation editor: "newline" fails after symbols
2011-10-13 07:33:16 Bug Watch Updater df-libreoffice: status Unknown Confirmed
2011-10-13 07:33:16 Bug Watch Updater df-libreoffice: importance Unknown Medium
2011-12-24 13:44:05 Bug Watch Updater df-libreoffice: status Confirmed Incomplete
2012-01-17 21:56:07 Bug Watch Updater df-libreoffice: status Incomplete Confirmed
2012-03-21 11:38:19 penalvch description 1) lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 11.10 Release: 11.10 2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer libreoffice-writer: Installed: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 Candidate: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status apt-cache policy libreoffice-math libreoffice-math: Installed: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 Candidate: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal: cd ~/Desktop && wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/281053/+attachment/2417117/+files/math_newline_issue.tar.gz && file-roller -h math_newline_issue.tar.gz && cd math_newline_issue && lowriter -nologo math_newline_issue.odt is no upside down question marks are presented in the Math formulas. 4) What happens is the upside down question marks are present erroneously due to "newline" command. If "newline" is preceded or followed by some characters (as +, -, =, which are often needed), some error marks "¿" are obtained, and perhaps only a single line if displayed (it depends on the character and its relative position to "newline"). Examples : a+b_ij = newline = c+d # single line; error mark a+b_ij newline = c+d # two lines; missing "="; error mark a+b_ij newline + c+d # correct behaviour !! The "+" sign does fine after newline... a+b_ij + newline c+d # ... but not before: single line, error mark here a+b_ij = newline c+d # single line, error mark. The "=" sign does bad whether after or before newline ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 10 03:31:54 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: openoffice.org-core 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron:  PATH=/usr/lib/openoffice/program:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games  LANG=es_ES.UTF-8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-rt i686 1) lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 11.10 Release: 11.10 2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer libreoffice-writer:   Installed: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2   Candidate: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2   Version table:  *** 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 0         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status apt-cache policy libreoffice-math libreoffice-math:   Installed: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2   Candidate: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2   Version table:  *** 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 0         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal: cd ~/Desktop && wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/281053/+attachment/2417117/+files/math_newline_issue.tar.gz && file-roller -h math_newline_issue.tar.gz && cd math_newline_issue && lowriter -nologo math_newline_issue.odt is no upside down question marks are presented in the Math formulas. 4) What happens is the upside down question marks are present erroneously due to "newline" command. If "newline" is preceded or followed by some characters (as +, -, =, which are often needed), some error marks "¿" are obtained, and perhaps only a single line if displayed (it depends on the character and its relative position to "newline"). Examples : a+b_ij = newline = c+d # single line; error mark a+b_ij newline = c+d # two lines; missing "="; error mark a+b_ij newline + c+d # correct behaviour !! The "+" sign does fine after newline... a+b_ij + newline c+d # ... but not before: single line, error mark here a+b_ij = newline c+d # single line, error mark. The "=" sign does bad whether after or before newline WORKAROUND: {} newline {} ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 10 03:31:54 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: openoffice.org-core 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron:  PATH=/usr/lib/openoffice/program:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games  LANG=es_ES.UTF-8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-rt i686
2012-03-27 07:08:28 Bug Watch Updater df-libreoffice: status Confirmed Fix Released
2012-04-10 07:34:39 Bug Watch Updater df-libreoffice: status Fix Released Confirmed
2019-08-13 11:44:06 Marcus Tomlinson libreoffice (Ubuntu): status Triaged Incomplete
2019-08-13 12:37:41 Marcus Tomlinson bug watch added https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41739
2019-08-13 12:37:41 Marcus Tomlinson df-libreoffice: importance Medium Unknown
2019-08-13 12:37:41 Marcus Tomlinson df-libreoffice: status Confirmed Unknown
2019-08-13 12:37:41 Marcus Tomlinson df-libreoffice: remote watch freedesktop.org Bugzilla #41739 Document Foundation Bugzilla #41739
2019-09-02 17:21:04 Bug Watch Updater df-libreoffice: status Unknown Confirmed
2019-09-02 17:21:04 Bug Watch Updater df-libreoffice: importance Unknown Medium
2019-09-25 13:17:01 Marcus Tomlinson libreoffice (Ubuntu): status Incomplete Confirmed
2019-09-28 02:55:09 Ian Phillips removed subscriber Ian Phillips
2020-11-19 12:25:50 Bug Watch Updater df-libreoffice: status Confirmed Invalid