[SRU] libreoffice 7.5.3 for lunar
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
libreoffice (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Rico Tzschichholz | ||
Lunar |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Rico Tzschichholz | ||
Mantic |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Rico Tzschichholz |
Bug Description
[Impact]
* LibreOffice 7.5.3 is in its third bugfix release of the 7.5 line:
https:/
* Version 7.5.2 is currently released in lunar. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.5.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.5.3 (that's a total of 119 bugs):
https:/
https:/
* Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.
[Testing]
* Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually).
* A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
https:/
* More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
* Automated tests
https:/
* Automated UI tests
https:/
* Regression tests
https:/
* Feature tests
https:/
* Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing.
Tested build can be found at https:/
* [amd64] https:/
* [arm64] https:/
* [armhf] https:/
* [ppc64el] https:/
* [riscv64] not available
* [s390x] https:/
* General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https:/
[Regression Potential]
* A minor release with a total of 119 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed.
* A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in.
Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) |
Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu Lunar): | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
assignee: | nobody → Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu Lunar): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic): | |
status: | New → In Progress |
Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic): | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
Given that this is an SRU bug there is no reason to subscribe the ubuntu-release team to the bug report. Is there some documentation that led you to believe that this was the correct thing to do? If so we should get that documentation fixed!