BQ Aquaris E4.5 Android Phone not recognised by libmtp
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | libmtp (Ubuntu) |
High
|
Unassigned | ||
| | Trusty |
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
* Impact
the device is not listed in the desktop interface
* Test case
somebody owning the device there should connect it to an ubuntu desktop and check that it's correctly list
* Regression potential
check that mtp devices keep working as they should (listed in nautilus, can copy files, etc)
--------
The bq Aquaris E4.5 phone is not recognised when in MTP file mode by Ubuntu.
idVendor=2a47, idProduct=2012
Tested on a trusty/14.04 laptop with all recommended apt-get update's as of 5th Sep (sorry for long reporting delay).
Reproduction Proceedure:
- Plug a BQ Aquaris E4.5 Android phone into the Ubuntu desktop via a USB cable
- Expect to see a natuilus window pop up, with the option to browse and copy files to the phone's file system
- Actual result: no response from the Ubuntu host.
Related branches
| John McAleely (john.mcaleely) wrote : | #1 |
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #2 |
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
| Changed in libmtp (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Peter Grandi (pg-8) wrote : | #3 |
From the #Ubuntu-Touch IRC channel the suggestion that worked was to use the Phablet-Team tools PPA: https:/
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #4 |
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
| Changed in libmtp (Ubuntu Trusty): | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Changed in libmtp (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | Confirmed → Fix Released |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
| Changed in libmtp (Ubuntu Trusty): | |
| status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
| description: | updated |
| no longer affects: | libmtp (Ubuntu Utopic) |
| Chris J Arges (arges) wrote : | #5 |
@seb128:
What's with the upload version? 1.1.6-20-
1.1.6-20-
Thanks,
--chris
| Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | #6 |
@Chris, I guess it could, does it make a difference? do you want me to reupload?
| Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : | #7 |
It doesn't make a functional difference but I went ahead and changed it anyway.
Hello John, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libmtp into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https:/
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
| Changed in libmtp (Ubuntu Trusty): | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| tags: | added: verification-needed |
| tags: |
added: verification-done removed: verification-needed |
| Jeremie Tamburini (jeremie2) wrote : | #9 |
Hi Brian,
It works.
I've just enabled the -proposed and installed the libmtp 1.1.6-20-
Thanks, well done!
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #10 |
This bug was fixed in the package libmtp - 1.1.6-20-
---------------
libmtp (1.1.6-
* debian/
updated devices list using the wily version, includes
- nvidia Shield (lp: #1487471)
- Lenovo S90 (lp: #1455626)
- BQ E4.5 (lp: #1376212)
-- Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> Thu, 01 Oct 2015 11:41:24 +0200
| Changed in libmtp (Ubuntu Trusty): | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
| Chris J Arges (arges) wrote : Update Released | #11 |
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libmtp has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.


@rsalveti - is this the bug you expected when you commented on bug #1366057 (currently private - sorry!).