liblo0 needs to be updated

Bug #423792 reported by Matthias Klumpp
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
liblo (Debian)
New
Unknown
liblo (Ubuntu)
Fix Committed
Undecided
Matthias Klumpp

Bug Description

liblo0-dev version 0.26 is available, but Debian and Ubuntu only have 0.23 packaged.
A package which I am packaging at time needs a newer version, it would be great if liblo0-dev could be updated.

Matthias Klumpp (ximion)
affects: ubuntu → liblo (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klumpp (ximion) wrote :

I attached an updated version of that package.

Changed in liblo (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Matthias Klumpp (ximion)
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klumpp (ximion) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klumpp (ximion) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klumpp (ximion) wrote :
Changed in liblo (Debian):
status: Unknown → New
Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

We're in Feature Freeze right now, can you follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess ?

For Ubuntu it should be 0.26-0ubuntu1 and it (LP: #423792) in debian/changelog. Attaching the .diff.gz should be good enough.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Why do you bump debian/compat, the debhelper build-depends and the Standards-Version? They should have no impact and are better updated in Debian, or else we'll carry that diff for no good reason.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Also it doesn't build on amd64 karmic:
dh_installudev -pliblo0-dev
dh_lintian -pliblo0-dev
dh_install -pliblo0-dev
dh_install: liblo0-dev missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/lib*.a), aborting
make: *** [binary-install/liblo0-dev] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2
E: Failed autobuilding of package

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klumpp (ximion) wrote :

Oops!
This works. But the library was named liblo.so.0.23 -> liblo.7, so maybe the package name has to be changed.
I updated those information to fix some lintian errors. Is a feature-freeze exception necessary? The package is nothing critical, just a "nice to have" for applications that need liblo > 0.23.

Revision history for this message
Artur Rona (ari-tczew) wrote :

Thanks for duplicating bug #255360

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klumpp (ximion) wrote :

Oh, sorry! It was too late yesterday, I haven't seen those bug reports.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.