libittp fortran transition
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
libitpp (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
StefanPotyra | ||
Gutsy |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Hardy |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
StefanPotyra |
Bug Description
The latest package closes http://
Some changes in build-depends have been done.
Since the package fixes a debian bug and also includes clean up, I request a exception. Complete changelog below.
Complete changelog
-------
libitpp (4.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
+ zdotusub used to wrap all zdotu_ calls.
* debian/patches:
+ Remove all patches.
* debian/rules, debian/control:
+ quilt not used.
-- Kumar Appaiah <email address hidden> Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:38:56 +0530
libitpp (4.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/
This patch has been added to use double _Complex as the return type of
zdotu_ to work around errors in assuming direct convertibility to
std:
* debian/control, debian/rules:
+ Use quilt for patch management.
* debian/rules:
+ Separate architecture dependent and independent build rules.
-- Kumar Appaiah <email address hidden> Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:48:04 +0530
libitpp (4.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
* Upload to unstable:
+ gfortran transition complete. (Closes: #466047)
* debian/patches:
+ zdotu_fix.diff: Removed; merged upstream.
* debian/control:
+ Don't build-depend on quilt: no longer needed.
+ Change Build-depends on doxygen to remove Debian revision.
* debian/rules:
+ Don't use quilt.
-- Kumar Appaiah <email address hidden> Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:29:40 +0530
Related branches
description: | updated |
Hm... I'm a bit sceptical: after looking at a few packages, it looks like we didn't do the gfortran transition (http:// wiki.debian. org/GfortranTra nsition) in universe yet. Hence, I guess it only makes sense to bring this package in, if we fully do the gfortran transition.
Now, I'm entirely unsure if it's appropriate that late in the cycle, to start this transition. My gut feeling is, that it would be better to be aligned with unstable on this, but I'd like to hear what other -release members think. (And I guess pinging doko what he thinks about doing the transition might be a good idea, too).