bus error on https site
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
libgcrypt7 (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
libgcrypt7 (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #1 |
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #2 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:43:08 -0400
From: Clint Adams <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: oops
reassign 242666 libgcrypt7
merge 228855 242666
quit
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #4 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:17:35 -0400
From: Clint Adams <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: i just made it worse
reassign 242668 libgcrypt7
reassign 241753 libgnutls10
merge 228855 242668
quit
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #5 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:40:57 +0200
From: Werner Koch <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: libgcrypt7 is not supported
Hi!
libgcrypt7 is not supported by upstream because it has always been
marked as work-in-progress.
Please replace it by the current libgcrypt (1.1.94) which will RSN be
re-released as the stable 1.2. We are then going to track down any
remaining problems. It is impossible for us to maintain old alpha
versions Libgcrypt. There won't be any API changes in the future thus
it is a *very good idea* to switch to the current libgcrypt *now*.
Thanks.
Werner
--
Werner Koch <email address hidden>
The GnuPG Experts http://
Free Software Foundation Europe http://
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #6 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:41:14 +0200
From: Ivo Timmermans <email address hidden>
To: Werner Koch <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#242666: libgcrypt7 is not supported
Werner Koch wrote:
> libgcrypt7 is not supported by upstream because it has always been
> marked as work-in-progress.
>
> Please replace it by the current libgcrypt (1.1.94) which will RSN be
> re-released as the stable 1.2. We are then going to track down any
> remaining problems. It is impossible for us to maintain old alpha
> versions Libgcrypt. There won't be any API changes in the future thus
> it is a *very good idea* to switch to the current libgcrypt *now*.
I don't really have an opinion on this, so I'd like to hear what other
people think of it. Should I replace libgcrypt7 with libgcrypt11 (and
recompile gnutls10 against it) before sarge is released?
Ivo
--
Floating point exception
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #7 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:43:52 +0200
From: Werner Koch <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#242666: libgcrypt7 is not supported
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:41:14 +0200, Ivo Timmermans said:
> I don't really have an opinion on this, so I'd like to hear what other
> people think of it. Should I replace libgcrypt7 with libgcrypt11 (and
> recompile gnutls10 against it) before sarge is released?
Pretty please.
We will release 1.2 this week - it will merely be a changed version
number.
Werner
--
g10 Code GmbH http://
H�tr. 61 Gesch�sf� Werner Koch
D-40699 Erkrath -=- The GnuPG Experts -=- USt-Id DE215605608
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #8 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:44:01 +0100
From: Colin Watson <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Werner Koch <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#242666: libgcrypt7 is not supported
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 09:41:14AM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> Werner Koch wrote:
> > libgcrypt7 is not supported by upstream because it has always been
> > marked as work-in-progress.
> >
> > Please replace it by the current libgcrypt (1.1.94) which will RSN be
> > re-released as the stable 1.2. We are then going to track down any
> > remaining problems. It is impossible for us to maintain old alpha
> > versions Libgcrypt. There won't be any API changes in the future thus
> > it is a *very good idea* to switch to the current libgcrypt *now*.
>
> I don't really have an opinion on this, so I'd like to hear what other
> people think of it. Should I replace libgcrypt7 with libgcrypt11 (and
> recompile gnutls10 against it) before sarge is released?
It is very painful to change the version of libgcrypt7 in base at this
point. Doing this will break debian-installer testing, which is the
reason we asked for no further changes to the package lists in the base
system. debian-installer beta3 had to be re-released due to the last
libgnutls/libgcrypt change.
If you are still considering this, you must coordinate very closely with
the debootstrap maintainers and debian-boot.
--
Colin Watson [<email address hidden>]
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #9 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:27:07 +0200
From: Werner Koch <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#242666: libgcrypt7 is not supported
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:44:01 +0100, Colin Watson said:
> It is very painful to change the version of libgcrypt7 in base at this
> point. Doing this will break debian-installer testing, which is the
> reason we asked for no further changes to the package lists in the base
I was not aware of the wide use Debian suddenly made of libgcrypt,
despite that libgcrypt was flagged as work-in-progress. Fortunately
that revealed a lot of problems we have by now solved.
The major change between libgcrypt7 and 11 is an API change in the
gcry_ac_* interface. This interface is pretty new and I doubt that it
is used by any non-experimental package. Thus the migration to 11
should not be too problematic.
The advantage of 11 is that we now use versioned symbols (ala glibc)
to avoid future ABI breaks. This won't help us right now but will be
very helpful in the future.
There is another huge problems with applications inadvertently using
Libgcrypt: The might link to two version of Libgcrypt. OpenLDAP for
example uses gnutls which in turn uses libgcrypt1 - any new
application or development project using libgcrypt and LDAP (say for
key retrieval) will probably link against two versions - that is a Bad
Thing.
I don't see any solution other then to remove all libgcrypt versions
except for the stable one (11). Yes, this needs updates of a lot of
packages but source code changes shouldn't be too hard because gnutls
seems to be the major user of libgcrypt.
I am sorry for that and I regret that I forgot to subscribe to the
libgcrypt7 PTS.
Werner
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #10 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:04:57 +0200
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, Werner Koch <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#242666: libgcrypt7 is not supported
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 09:44:01 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> It is very painful to change the version of libgcrypt7 in base at this
> point. Doing this will break debian-installer testing, which is the reason
> we asked for no further changes to the package lists in the base system.
> debian-installer beta3 had to be re-released due to the last
> libgnutls/libgcrypt change.
I realise it will be painful to make this transition, but the benefits
Werner lists (in particular, avoiding future ABI breaks and avoiding the
problems we already see with processes that load two versions of gcrypt
simultaneously) outweigh the pain by quite a bit IMHO.
> If you are still considering this, you must coordinate very closely with
> the debootstrap maintainers and debian-boot.
Ivo works a stress ball's throw away from one of the debootstrap maintainers
(me), so coordination with regards to debootstrap shouldn't be a problem.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:27:07 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> I was not aware of the wide use Debian suddenly made of libgcrypt, despite
> that libgcrypt was flagged as work-in-progress.
It's a side effect of our wide use of GnuTLS in order to avoid the issue of
needing explicit exemption clauses in order to be able to redistribute
works based on GPLed code that use the OpenSSL library.
Also, it's not as wide as current Debian binary package dependencies may
lead you to believe. Quite a few binary packages specify a Depends: on a
version of libgcrypt while their executables don't reference symbols from
libgcrypt directly but just happen to be linked to libraries that do. This
is an artefact of how older versions of libtool used to work. Relibtoolising
their source packages will contain the libgcrypt dependency to just those
libraries; I've already done this for several of the GNOME packages (which
suffer from other inflated library dependencies as well, primarily on
libgnutls, libtasn and libaudiofile).
Ray
--
Subtlety is fine. It might warrant a comment, though.
Linus Torvalds
in <email address hidden>
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #11 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:49:24 +0200
From: Werner Koch <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#242666: libgcrypt7 is not supported
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:04:57 +0200, J H M Dassen (Ray) said:
> It's a side effect of our wide use of GnuTLS in order to avoid the issue of
> needing explicit exemption clauses in order to be able to redistribute
> works based on GPLed code that use the OpenSSL library.
I know and this is for sure a very Good Thing.
> libgcrypt directly but just happen to be linked to libraries that do. This
> is an artefact of how older versions of libtool used to work. Relibtoolising
> their source packages will contain the libgcrypt dependency to just those
Good to know.
Werner
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #12 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:50:54 -0400
From: Clint Adams <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: sparc64 libgcrypt breaks mutt, lynx, etc.
severity 228855 grave
quit
This makes using gnutls on sparc64 impossible at times.
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #13 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:08:38 -0400
From: Joey Hess <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#242666: libgcrypt7 is not supported
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> I realise it will be painful to make this transition, but the benefits
> Werner lists (in particular, avoiding future ABI breaks and avoiding the
> problems we already see with processes that load two versions of gcrypt
> simultaneously) outweigh the pain by quite a bit IMHO.
If this change was made today (in testing), it would break all existing
sarge businesscard isos, and would require a debootstrap-udeb updated
for the dependency change to enter testing concurrently to avoid
breaking floppy and netboot installs as well. Updating and re-testing
the isos would take a minimum of 3 days, this could easily waste us a
week of development time on d-i. More likely we would leave them broken,
and lose two weeks of testing by users of those isos.
If, as seems more likely, this change were made sometime this week in
unstable, and hit testing after the usual delay, then it would reach
testing between the 24th and 30th. We plan to release beta 4 of the
Debian installer on the 28th, a build process which will begin on the
24th. If it reached testing on the 24th, this would leave us no time for
testing. If it reached testing on the 25th through 28th, we would have
to restart the release process, losing between 1 and 4 days, and again,
having no real chance to test things. If it reached testing just after
our release, we're back to the scenario outlined in my paragraph above,
except now we have an influx of users to cope with at the same time
everything is breaking.
So no, it's not as easy as you seem to think it is, and it has the
potential to either delay beta 4 by 4 days to a week, force us to ship
something not as tested as we'd hope to, or break beta 4 immediatly
after it is released.
--=20
see shy jo
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAfX4ld8H
5sogI3J7gNVgWKk
=ngM0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA2
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #14 |
*** Bug 6776 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #15 |
This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6771.
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #16 |
Message-ID: <20040710132819
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:28:20 +0200
From: "Matthias Urlichs" <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Please try to reproduce
--9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
tag 242666 +unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
please try to reproduce this problem against a publically accessible
site. I could not do it with the versions I just uploaded.
Thanks.
--=20
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | <email address hidden>
--9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA7+
AteWoIDIzAPuM/
=L0Fp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9UV9rz0O2dU/
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #17 |
Message-ID: <20040710153209
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:32:10 +0200
From: "Matthias Urlichs" <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug hunt!
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
tag 228855 +help
thanks
Hi,
As the new maintainer, I'd like to fix this bug ASAP.
Can somebody give me a login on a system which exhibits the problem?
Thanks!
--=20
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | <email address hidden>
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA8Av58+
pihmmwImYT1Nb2e
=2u3R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--k1lZvvs/
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #18 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:54:35 -0400
From: Clint Adams <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: libgcrypt7 on sparc
Bus error with
lynx https:/
and
gnutls-cli-debug -p 443 gmail.google.com
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #19 |
Message-ID: <20040712024655
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 04:46:55 +0200
From: "Matthias Urlichs" <email address hidden>
To: Clint Adams <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: libgcrypt7 on sparc
--ieNMXl1Fr3cevapt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
tag 228855 +pending
tag 242666 +pending
tag 242668 +pending
thanks
Hi,
Clint Adams:
> Bus error
Got it.
--=20
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | <email address hidden>
--ieNMXl1Fr3cevapt
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA8fuf8+
lXhuamLbigKY8km
=5Ref
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ieNMXl1Fr3cev
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #20 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:02:05 -0400
From: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#228855: fixed in libgcrypt7 1.1.90-6
Source: libgcrypt7
Source-Version: 1.1.90-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgcrypt7, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libgcrypt7-
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7-
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden> (supplier of updated libgcrypt7 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Changed-By: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:11:45 +0200
Version: 1.1.90-6
Distribution: unstable
Source: libgcrypt7
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
Binary: libgcrypt7 libgcrypt7-dev libgcrypt7-doc
Architecture: i386 all source
Closes: 228855 242666 242668 258879
Changes:
libgcrypt7 (1.1.90-6) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Applied unaligned access fix to rijndael.c.
- Closes: #242666,
* Detect k*BSD correctly
- Closes: #258879
Description:
libgcrypt7-doc - LGPL Crypto library - documentation
libgcrypt7 - LGPL Crypto library - runtime library
libgcrypt7-dev - LGPL Crypto library - development files
Files:
7d00ce623810a3
13ddbbe0d4bd5a
a31c15d459bd16
ba0e08988e633d
576b77d93708fd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA8gkk8+
ulY6Zf+
=tTUt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #21 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:02:05 -0400
From: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#242666: fixed in libgcrypt7 1.1.90-6
Source: libgcrypt7
Source-Version: 1.1.90-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgcrypt7, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libgcrypt7-
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7-
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden> (supplier of updated libgcrypt7 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Changed-By: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:11:45 +0200
Version: 1.1.90-6
Distribution: unstable
Source: libgcrypt7
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
Binary: libgcrypt7 libgcrypt7-dev libgcrypt7-doc
Architecture: i386 all source
Closes: 228855 242666 242668 258879
Changes:
libgcrypt7 (1.1.90-6) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Applied unaligned access fix to rijndael.c.
- Closes: #242666,
* Detect k*BSD correctly
- Closes: #258879
Description:
libgcrypt7-doc - LGPL Crypto library - documentation
libgcrypt7 - LGPL Crypto library - runtime library
libgcrypt7-dev - LGPL Crypto library - development files
Files:
7d00ce623810a3
13ddbbe0d4bd5a
a31c15d459bd16
ba0e08988e633d
576b77d93708fd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA8gkk8+
ulY6Zf+
=tTUt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #22 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:57:19 -0700
From: Joshua Kwan <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, om@8304.ch, <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>
Subject: gcrypt7 problems - not quite fixed!
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
reopen 242666
reopen 228855
reopen 242668
thanks
I rolled a libgcrypt7/sparc for myself, 1.1.90-6, and mutt now says
Rijndael-128 test encryption failed.
gnutls_handshake: A TLS fatal alert has been received.(Bad record MAC)
when connecting to my IMAP server using mutt. It can't proceed to open
the mailbox after that.
gnutls-cli-debug -p 993 triplehelix.org
and=20
gnutls-cli-debug -p 443 gmail.google.com
also produce the Rijndael test encryption error, but they exit with a
successful status. So is this broken, or what?
(For those interested: http://
unstripped, unoptimized packages of -6.)
--=20
Joshua Kwan
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://
iQIVAwUBQPIoP6O
LU3dybkVSUE5ydY
ff+7c/52gHlypqu
vwh0dQdr9KzuoKp
qlG5oF21KYfXj3w
SF7ysOgN8YzAUCR
Mp/I0PcVymzSyrG
bggQEBDfQONciEC
Cng5Xemszo5wOge
AG/2ijtDLrXpPhg
pt/iRMt1fLgg4mD
KWjSAWN0E6I=
=uJHm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #23 |
Message-ID: <20040712073409
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:34:10 +0200
From: "Matthias Urlichs" <email address hidden>
To: Joshua Kwan <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>, om@8304.ch, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#242666: gcrypt7 problems - not quite fixed!
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
Hi,
Joshua Kwan:
> also produce the Rijndael test encryption error, but they exit with a
> successful status. So is this broken, or what?
>=20
Yes, it's still broken. Certain programs should exit with an error if
they see an error. :-(
I'm fixing it.
--=20
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | <email address hidden>
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA8j7x8+
N+f4I62x/
=8aYA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--M9NhX3UHpAaci
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #24 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 04:47:04 -0400
From: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#228855: fixed in libgcrypt7 1.1.90-7
Source: libgcrypt7
Source-Version: 1.1.90-7
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgcrypt7, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libgcrypt7-
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7-
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden> (supplier of updated libgcrypt7 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Changed-By: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:47:01 +0200
Version: 1.1.90-7
Distribution: unstable
Source: libgcrypt7
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
Binary: libgcrypt7 libgcrypt7-dev libgcrypt7-doc
Architecture: i386 all source
Closes: 228855 242666 242668
Changes:
libgcrypt7 (1.1.90-7) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Repaired the unaligned access fix to rijndael.c.
- Closes: #242666,
Description:
libgcrypt7-doc - LGPL Crypto library - documentation
libgcrypt7 - LGPL Crypto library - runtime library
libgcrypt7-dev - LGPL Crypto library - development files
Files:
acb7436031c9cd
78882398f41f57
17ed546c136095
86d1782dbddb4a
395a0566ed1e47
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA8kuF8+
F5+o0juLnBU2mLD
=9Zth
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
![](/+icing/build/overlay/assets/skins/sam/images/close.gif)
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #25 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 04:47:04 -0400
From: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Bug#242666: fixed in libgcrypt7 1.1.90-7
Source: libgcrypt7
Source-Version: 1.1.90-7
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgcrypt7, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libgcrypt7-
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7-
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
libgcrypt7_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden> (supplier of updated libgcrypt7 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Changed-By: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:47:01 +0200
Version: 1.1.90-7
Distribution: unstable
Source: libgcrypt7
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Urlichs <email address hidden>
Binary: libgcrypt7 libgcrypt7-dev libgcrypt7-doc
Architecture: i386 all source
Closes: 228855 242666 242668
Changes:
libgcrypt7 (1.1.90-7) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Repaired the unaligned access fix to rijndael.c.
- Closes: #242666,
Description:
libgcrypt7-doc - LGPL Crypto library - documentation
libgcrypt7 - LGPL Crypto library - runtime library
libgcrypt7-dev - LGPL Crypto library - development files
Files:
acb7436031c9cd
78882398f41f57
17ed546c136095
86d1782dbddb4a
395a0566ed1e47
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA8kuF8+
F5+o0juLnBU2mLD
=9Zth
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Changed in libgcrypt7: | |
status: | Unknown → Fix Released |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:20:38 -0400
From: Clint Adams <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: bus error on https site
Package: libgnutls7
Version: 0.8.12-5
When attempting to connect to an HTTPS site (which is, unfortunately,
not publically accessible), lynx dies with a bus error. A recompile
with libgnutls10 does not solve the problem.
The site requires HTTP authorization. Applications linked with OpenSSL
are able to access the site without problem. elinks exhibits the same
problem.
#0 0x7031b22c in gcry_md_info () from /usr/lib/ libgcrypt. so.1 libgcrypt. so.1 libgcrypt. so.1 libgcrypt. so.1 libgcrypt. so.1 cipher_ encrypt () from /usr/lib/ libgnutls. so.7 compressed2ciph ertext () from /usr/lib/ libgnutls. so.7 libgnutls. so.7 libgnutls. so.7 handshake_ io_send_ int () from /usr/lib/ libgnutls. so.7 send_handshake () from /usr/lib/ libgnutls. so.7 send_finished () from /usr/lib/ libgnutls. so.7 get_adv_ version () from /usr/lib/ libgnutls. so.7 handshake_ common () from /usr/lib/ libgnutls. so.7 libgnutls. so.7 libgnutls- extra.so. 7
#1 0x7031b70c in gcry_md_info () from /usr/lib/
#2 0x7030f4c4 in gcry_cipher_close () from /usr/lib/
#3 0x7030fc24 in gcry_cipher_close () from /usr/lib/
#4 0x7030fca8 in gcry_cipher_encrypt () from /usr/lib/
#5 0x700e2284 in _gnutls_
#6 0x700db694 in _gnutls_
#7 0x700db39c in _gnutls_encrypt () from /usr/lib/
#8 0x700daae4 in _gnutls_send_int () from /usr/lib/
#9 0x700dc1e8 in _gnutls_
#10 0x700dd06c in _gnutls_
#11 0x700dcae0 in _gnutls_
#12 0x700de990 in _gnutls_
#13 0x700ddca4 in _gnutls_
#14 0x700dd4fc in gnutls_handshake () from /usr/lib/
#15 0x700b6dbc in SSL_connect () from /usr/lib/
#16 0x000a50f0 in _init ()
#17 0x000a3e08 in _init ()
#18 0x000a41dc in _init ()
#19 0x000a4858 in _init ()
#20 0x00035d8c in _init ()
#21 0x00045a78 in _init ()
#22 0x00039990 in _init ()
#23 0x7015cdac in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
-- System Information:
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Versions of packages lynx depends on:
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-1 A high-quality block-sorting file
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgnutls7 0.8.12-5 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii libncursesw5 5.4-3 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-5 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information