package libdatetime-format-iso8601-perl 0.08-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration.

Bug #1309343 reported by CHOQUET
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
libdatetime-format-iso8601-perl (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

REFUSE TOUTE LES MISES A JOUR

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: libdatetime-format-iso8601-perl 0.08-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-20.34-generic 3.11.10.6
Uname: Linux 3.11.0-20-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Apr 17 10:11:31 2014
DuplicateSignature: package:libdatetime-format-iso8601-perl:0.08-1:Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration.
ErrorMessage: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration.
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-12 (64 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Release amd64 (20131016.1)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: libdatetime-format-iso8601-perl
Title: package libdatetime-format-iso8601-perl 0.08-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration.
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
CHOQUET (reiki-henri-choquet) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) wrote : Bug is not a security issue

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private Security → Public
tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.