Please merge libcgroup 0.41-6 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

Bug #1445036 reported by James Clarke on 2015-04-16
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
libcgroup (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Debian testing (Jessie at time of writing) has had libcgroup 0.41-6 for a while, but Ubuntu is still stuck with 0.38.

James Clarke (jrtc27) on 2015-04-16
Changed in libcgroup (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → James Clarke (jrtc27)
status: New → In Progress
James Clarke (jrtc27) on 2015-04-16
Changed in libcgroup (Ubuntu):
assignee: James Clarke (jrtc27) → nobody
status: In Progress → Confirmed
Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) wrote :

Since this doesn't install anything that runs automatically at boot, I'm ok with it in general. (Have not looked at the debdiffs in detail)

Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

The cgroup-bin preinst/postinst/postrm bits are all obsolete as they were done in trusty already. This wasn't mentioned in your merge changelog for the record.

+ * Merge from Debian unstable (LP: #1145036). Merge conflicts:
+ - Upstream has its own libcgroup-dbg package; use that instead of our own

There is no actual change that would reflect this description.

+ - Upstream has renamed cgroup-bin has been renamed to cgroup-tools, with
+ cgroup-bin left for compatibility. The cgroup-lite dependency is now
+ associated with cgroup-tools.

I'll clean up the weird grammar there :-)

However, there is no justification for this delta in the first place. It was introduced in

libcgroup (0.38-1ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low

  * Merge from debian unstable
  * Depend on cgroup-lite

 -- Serge Hallyn <email address hidden> Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:49:49 -0500

Serge, why was this done?

Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Uploaded with cleanups, thanks!

Changed in libcgroup (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Fix Committed
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :
Changed in libcgroup (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) wrote :

@pitti not sure which "this" you mean ("why was this done") . If you mean depending on cgroup-lite, it's bc things needed it and its debian equivalent inspired by cgroup-lite didn't yet exist.

I see you merged it the debian package - thanks! Sorry I hadn't gotten around to it yet.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers