Comment 139 for bug 445852

Revision history for this message
In , Lennart-poettering (lennart-poettering) wrote :

(In reply to comment #6)

>
> Comment #129 of the Ubuntu Bug Report is well worth reading, because it seems
> to be isolating the bug.

I don't think so. That proposed patch is bogus, identify_valid is FALSE unless set to TRUE anyway.

Also, supposedly SMART does work with smartmontools, just not with libatasmart, right? That comment suggests that SMART would not work at all with those SSDs.

Andrew, do you have one of the SSDs affected? Could you step through the code and figure out exactly which command triggers the problem?