2024-03-18 05:46:53 |
Dirk Su |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2024-03-18 05:47:09 |
Dirk Su |
ubuntu: importance |
Undecided |
Wishlist |
|
2024-03-18 05:49:38 |
Dirk Su |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber OEM Solutions Group: Engineers |
2024-03-18 05:49:44 |
Dirk Su |
tags |
|
oem-priority originate-from-1956804 sutton |
|
2024-03-19 06:49:31 |
Dirk Su |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber MIR approval team |
2024-03-19 15:58:50 |
Christian Ehrhardt |
ubuntu: status |
New |
Incomplete |
|
2024-03-19 15:59:35 |
Lukas Märdian |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors |
2024-03-25 09:16:21 |
Phoenix Liao |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Chi-Wei Chen |
2024-03-25 15:00:30 |
Chi-Wei Chen |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Nitin Joshi |
2024-03-25 15:00:51 |
Chi-Wei Chen |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Mark Pearson |
2024-03-27 09:23:15 |
Dirk Su |
oem-priority: assignee |
|
Dirk Su (dirksu) |
|
2024-03-27 09:23:21 |
Dirk Su |
oem-priority: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
2024-04-04 21:10:54 |
Lucas Kanashiro |
removed subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors |
|
|
|
2024-06-28 16:05:27 |
Jeremy Bícha |
affects |
ubuntu |
lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu) |
|
2024-06-28 16:06:21 |
Jeremy Bícha |
lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): status |
Incomplete |
New |
|
2024-06-28 16:06:23 |
Jeremy Bícha |
lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): importance |
Wishlist |
Undecided |
|
2024-06-28 16:06:31 |
Jeremy Bícha |
summary |
[MIR][needs-packaging] lenovo-wwan-unlock |
[MIR] lenovo-wwan-unlock |
|
2024-06-28 16:07:46 |
Jeremy Bícha |
description |
[Availability]
The package lenovo-wwan-unlock build for the architectures it is designed to work on.
It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64
Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock
[Rationale]
- The package lenovo-wwan-unlock is required in Ubuntu restricted for WWAN hardware support
- The package lenovo-wwan-unlock will generally be useful for a large part of
our user base
- There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or
should go universe->main instead of this.
- It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the
package lenovo-fccunlock and lenovo-cfgservice in Ubuntu restricted, but there is no definitive deadline.
[Security]
- No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past
- no `suid` or `sgid` binaries
- Binary configservice_lenovo and DPR_Fcc_unlock_service in /opt/fcc_lenovo/ is no problem because AppArmor constraints applied
- Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs
lenovo-fccunlock.service
lenovo-cfgservice.service
- Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation
patterns are in place utilizing the following features:
AppArmor constraints had been included:
- opt.fcc_lenovo.DPR_Fcc_unlock_service
- opt.fcc_lenovo.configservice_lenovo
- Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024).
- Packages does not expose any external endpoints
- Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software
(filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...)
[Quality assurance - function/usage]
- The package works well right after install
[Quality assurance - maintenance]
- The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does
not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs
- https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock/issues
- The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support
[Quality assurance - testing]
- The package does not run a test at build time because it contains only binary files
- The package can not be well tested at build or autopkgtest time
because it will need real hardware for testing. To make up for that:
- We have access to such hardware in the team
- Based on that access outlined above, here are the details of the
test plan
execute service by systemd command
sudo systemctl start lenovo-fccunlock
sudo systemctl start lenovo-cfgservice
and (if already possible) example output of a test run:
- output of lenovo-fccunlock: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nsFBW3jXDk/
- output ot lenovo-cfgservice: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8rCFqRHQ8V/
We will execute that test plan
on-uploads
[Quality assurance - packaging]
- debian/watch is not present because it is a native package and need to add
AppArmor configs
- debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field
- This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors
- Please link to a recent build log of the package
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/719472309/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.lenovo-wwan-unlock_1.2ubuntu3-0~202403150905~ubuntu24.04.1_BUILDING.txt.gz
- Please attach the full output you have got from
`lintian --pedantic` log: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Mm6CX7QgFc/
- Lintian overrides are not present
- This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.
- This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies
- The package will not be installed by default
- Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules
https://git.launchpad.net/~dirksu/+git/lenovo-fccunlock-sar/tree/debian/control
[UI standards]
- Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation)
[Dependencies]
- No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main
[Standards compliance]
- This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy
[Maintenance/Owner]
- The owning team will be canonical-mainstream and I have their acknowledgement for
that commitment
- The future owning team is already subscribed to the package
- This does not use static builds
- This does not use vendored code
- This package is not rust based
- The package was test rebuilt in PPA or sbuild recently
PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dirksu/+archive/ubuntu/fccunlock-test
[Background information]
The Package description explains the package well
Upstream Name is lenovo-wwan-unlock
Link to upstream project https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock |
[Availability]
The package lenovo-wwan-unlock build for the architectures it is designed to work on.
It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64
Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock
[Rationale]
- The package lenovo-wwan-unlock is required in Ubuntu restricted for WWAN hardware support
- The package lenovo-wwan-unlock will generally be useful for a large part of
our user base
- There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or
should go universe->main instead of this.
- It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the
package lenovo-fccunlock and lenovo-cfgservice in Ubuntu restricted, but there is no definitive deadline.
[Security]
- No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past
- no `suid` or `sgid` binaries
- Binary configservice_lenovo and DPR_Fcc_unlock_service in /opt/fcc_lenovo/ is no problem because AppArmor constraints applied
- Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs
lenovo-fccunlock.service
lenovo-cfgservice.service
- Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation
patterns are in place utilizing the following features:
AppArmor constraints had been included:
- opt.fcc_lenovo.DPR_Fcc_unlock_service
- opt.fcc_lenovo.configservice_lenovo
- Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024).
- Packages does not expose any external endpoints
- Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software
(filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...)
[Quality assurance - function/usage]
- The package works well right after install
[Quality assurance - maintenance]
- The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does
not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs
- https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock/issues
- The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support
[Quality assurance - testing]
- The package does not run a test at build time because it contains only binary files
- The package can not be well tested at build or autopkgtest time
because it will need real hardware for testing. To make up for that:
- We have access to such hardware in the team
- Based on that access outlined above, here are the details of the
test plan
execute service by systemd command
sudo systemctl start lenovo-fccunlock
sudo systemctl start lenovo-cfgservice
and (if already possible) example output of a test run:
- output of lenovo-fccunlock: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nsFBW3jXDk/
- output of lenovo-cfgservice: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8rCFqRHQ8V/
We will execute that test plan
on-uploads
[Quality assurance - packaging]
- debian/watch is not present because it is a native package and need to add
AppArmor configs
- debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field
- This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors
- Please link to a recent build log of the package
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/2.0.0-0ubuntu1
- Please attach the full output you have got from
`lintian --pedantic` log: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Mm6CX7QgFc/
- Lintian overrides are not present
- This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.
- This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies
- The package will not be installed by default
- Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules
https://git.launchpad.net/~dirksu/+git/lenovo-fccunlock-sar/tree/debian/control
[UI standards]
- Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation)
[Dependencies]
- No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main
[Standards compliance]
- This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy
[Maintenance/Owner]
- The owning team will be canonical-mainstream and I have their acknowledgement for
that commitment
- The future owning team is already subscribed to the package
- This does not use static builds
- This does not use vendored code
- This package is not rust based
- The package was test rebuilt in PPA or sbuild recently
PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dirksu/+archive/ubuntu/fccunlock-test
[Background information]
The Package description explains the package well
Upstream Name is lenovo-wwan-unlock
Link to upstream project https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock |
|
2024-06-28 16:08:46 |
Jeremy Bícha |
description |
[Availability]
The package lenovo-wwan-unlock build for the architectures it is designed to work on.
It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64
Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock
[Rationale]
- The package lenovo-wwan-unlock is required in Ubuntu restricted for WWAN hardware support
- The package lenovo-wwan-unlock will generally be useful for a large part of
our user base
- There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or
should go universe->main instead of this.
- It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the
package lenovo-fccunlock and lenovo-cfgservice in Ubuntu restricted, but there is no definitive deadline.
[Security]
- No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past
- no `suid` or `sgid` binaries
- Binary configservice_lenovo and DPR_Fcc_unlock_service in /opt/fcc_lenovo/ is no problem because AppArmor constraints applied
- Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs
lenovo-fccunlock.service
lenovo-cfgservice.service
- Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation
patterns are in place utilizing the following features:
AppArmor constraints had been included:
- opt.fcc_lenovo.DPR_Fcc_unlock_service
- opt.fcc_lenovo.configservice_lenovo
- Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024).
- Packages does not expose any external endpoints
- Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software
(filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...)
[Quality assurance - function/usage]
- The package works well right after install
[Quality assurance - maintenance]
- The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does
not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs
- https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock/issues
- The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support
[Quality assurance - testing]
- The package does not run a test at build time because it contains only binary files
- The package can not be well tested at build or autopkgtest time
because it will need real hardware for testing. To make up for that:
- We have access to such hardware in the team
- Based on that access outlined above, here are the details of the
test plan
execute service by systemd command
sudo systemctl start lenovo-fccunlock
sudo systemctl start lenovo-cfgservice
and (if already possible) example output of a test run:
- output of lenovo-fccunlock: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nsFBW3jXDk/
- output of lenovo-cfgservice: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8rCFqRHQ8V/
We will execute that test plan
on-uploads
[Quality assurance - packaging]
- debian/watch is not present because it is a native package and need to add
AppArmor configs
- debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field
- This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors
- Please link to a recent build log of the package
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/2.0.0-0ubuntu1
- Please attach the full output you have got from
`lintian --pedantic` log: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Mm6CX7QgFc/
- Lintian overrides are not present
- This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.
- This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies
- The package will not be installed by default
- Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules
https://git.launchpad.net/~dirksu/+git/lenovo-fccunlock-sar/tree/debian/control
[UI standards]
- Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation)
[Dependencies]
- No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main
[Standards compliance]
- This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy
[Maintenance/Owner]
- The owning team will be canonical-mainstream and I have their acknowledgement for
that commitment
- The future owning team is already subscribed to the package
- This does not use static builds
- This does not use vendored code
- This package is not rust based
- The package was test rebuilt in PPA or sbuild recently
PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dirksu/+archive/ubuntu/fccunlock-test
[Background information]
The Package description explains the package well
Upstream Name is lenovo-wwan-unlock
Link to upstream project https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock |
[Availability]
The package lenovo-wwan-unlock build for the architectures it is designed to work on.
It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64
Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock
[Rationale]
- The package lenovo-wwan-unlock is required in Ubuntu restricted for WWAN hardware support
- The package lenovo-wwan-unlock will generally be useful for a large part of
our user base
- There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or
should go universe->main instead of this.
- It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the
package lenovo-fccunlock and lenovo-cfgservice in Ubuntu restricted, but there is no definitive deadline.
[Security]
- No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past
- no `suid` or `sgid` binaries
- Binary configservice_lenovo and DPR_Fcc_unlock_service in /opt/fcc_lenovo/ is no problem because AppArmor constraints applied
- Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs
lenovo-fccunlock.service
lenovo-cfgservice.service
- Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation
patterns are in place utilizing the following features:
AppArmor constraints had been included:
- opt.fcc_lenovo.DPR_Fcc_unlock_service
- opt.fcc_lenovo.configservice_lenovo
- Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024).
- Packages does not expose any external endpoints
- Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software
(filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...)
[Quality assurance - function/usage]
- The package works well right after install
[Quality assurance - maintenance]
- The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does
not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs
- https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock/issues
- The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support
[Quality assurance - testing]
- The package does not run a test at build time because it contains only binary files
- The package can not be well tested at build or autopkgtest time
because it will need real hardware for testing. To make up for that:
- We have access to such hardware in the team
- Based on that access outlined above, here are the details of the
test plan
execute service by systemd command
sudo systemctl start lenovo-fccunlock
sudo systemctl start lenovo-cfgservice
and (if already possible) example output of a test run:
- output of lenovo-fccunlock: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nsFBW3jXDk/
- output of lenovo-cfgservice: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8rCFqRHQ8V/
We will execute that test plan
on-uploads
[Quality assurance - packaging]
- debian/watch is not present because it is a native package and need to add
AppArmor configs
- debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field
- This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors
- Please link to a recent build log of the package
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/2.0.0-0ubuntu1
- Please attach the full output you have got from
`lintian --pedantic` log: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Mm6CX7QgFc/
- Lintian overrides are not present
- This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.
- This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies
- The package will not be installed by default
- Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules
https://git.launchpad.net/~dirksu/+git/lenovo-fccunlock-sar/tree/debian/control
[UI standards]
- Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation)
[Dependencies]
- No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main
[Standards compliance]
- This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy
[Maintenance/Owner]
- The owning team will be canonical-mainstream and I have their acknowledgement for
that commitment
- The future owning team is already subscribed to the package
- This does not use static builds
- This does not use vendored code
- This package is not rust based
- The package was test rebuilt in PPA or sbuild recently
PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dirksu/+archive/ubuntu/fccunlock-test
[Background information]
The Package description explains the package well
Upstream Name is lenovo-wwan-unlock
Link to upstream project https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock
The package is in multiverse so this is a request for promotion to 'restricted' instead of to main. |
|
2024-07-02 14:45:15 |
Didier Roche-Tolomelli |
lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): assignee |
|
Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) |
|
2024-07-03 00:39:17 |
Dirk Su |
oem-priority: importance |
Undecided |
Critical |
|
2024-07-05 10:42:29 |
Didier Roche-Tolomelli |
lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): assignee |
Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) |
Canonical Security Team (canonical-security) |
|
2024-07-05 10:42:59 |
Didier Roche-Tolomelli |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Didier Roche-Tolomelli |
2024-07-15 19:23:17 |
Mark Esler |
lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): assignee |
Canonical Security Team (canonical-security) |
Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) |
|
2024-07-15 21:59:01 |
Steve Beattie |
tags |
oem-priority originate-from-1956804 sutton |
oem-priority originate-from-1956804 sec-4736 sutton |
|