Activity log for bug #2058192

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2024-03-18 05:46:53 Dirk Su bug added bug
2024-03-18 05:47:09 Dirk Su ubuntu: importance Undecided Wishlist
2024-03-18 05:49:38 Dirk Su bug added subscriber OEM Solutions Group: Engineers
2024-03-18 05:49:44 Dirk Su tags oem-priority originate-from-1956804 sutton
2024-03-19 06:49:31 Dirk Su bug added subscriber MIR approval team
2024-03-19 15:58:50 Christian Ehrhardt  ubuntu: status New Incomplete
2024-03-19 15:59:35 Lukas Märdian bug added subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors
2024-03-25 09:16:21 Phoenix Liao bug added subscriber Chi-Wei Chen
2024-03-25 15:00:30 Chi-Wei Chen bug added subscriber Nitin Joshi
2024-03-25 15:00:51 Chi-Wei Chen bug added subscriber Mark Pearson
2024-03-27 09:23:15 Dirk Su oem-priority: assignee Dirk Su (dirksu)
2024-03-27 09:23:21 Dirk Su oem-priority: status New Confirmed
2024-04-04 21:10:54 Lucas Kanashiro removed subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors
2024-06-28 16:05:27 Jeremy Bícha affects ubuntu lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu)
2024-06-28 16:06:21 Jeremy Bícha lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): status Incomplete New
2024-06-28 16:06:23 Jeremy Bícha lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): importance Wishlist Undecided
2024-06-28 16:06:31 Jeremy Bícha summary [MIR][needs-packaging] lenovo-wwan-unlock [MIR] lenovo-wwan-unlock
2024-06-28 16:07:46 Jeremy Bícha description [Availability] The package lenovo-wwan-unlock build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock [Rationale] - The package lenovo-wwan-unlock is required in Ubuntu restricted for WWAN hardware support - The package lenovo-wwan-unlock will generally be useful for a large part of our user base - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the package lenovo-fccunlock and lenovo-cfgservice in Ubuntu restricted, but there is no definitive deadline. [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - Binary configservice_lenovo and DPR_Fcc_unlock_service in /opt/fcc_lenovo/ is no problem because AppArmor constraints applied - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs lenovo-fccunlock.service lenovo-cfgservice.service - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation patterns are in place utilizing the following features: AppArmor constraints had been included: - opt.fcc_lenovo.DPR_Fcc_unlock_service - opt.fcc_lenovo.configservice_lenovo - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Packages does not expose any external endpoints - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package does not run a test at build time because it contains only binary files - The package can not be well tested at build or autopkgtest time because it will need real hardware for testing. To make up for that: - We have access to such hardware in the team - Based on that access outlined above, here are the details of the test plan execute service by systemd command sudo systemctl start lenovo-fccunlock sudo systemctl start lenovo-cfgservice and (if already possible) example output of a test run: - output of lenovo-fccunlock: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nsFBW3jXDk/ - output ot lenovo-cfgservice: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8rCFqRHQ8V/ We will execute that test plan on-uploads [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is not present because it is a native package and need to add AppArmor configs - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors - Please link to a recent build log of the package https://launchpadlibrarian.net/719472309/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.lenovo-wwan-unlock_1.2ubuntu3-0~202403150905~ubuntu24.04.1_BUILDING.txt.gz - Please attach the full output you have got from `lintian --pedantic` log: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Mm6CX7QgFc/ - Lintian overrides are not present - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies - The package will not be installed by default - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules https://git.launchpad.net/~dirksu/+git/lenovo-fccunlock-sar/tree/debian/control [UI standards] - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies] - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - The owning team will be canonical-mainstream and I have their acknowledgement for that commitment - The future owning team is already subscribed to the package - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - This package is not rust based - The package was test rebuilt in PPA or sbuild recently PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dirksu/+archive/ubuntu/fccunlock-test [Background information] The Package description explains the package well Upstream Name is lenovo-wwan-unlock Link to upstream project https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock [Availability] The package lenovo-wwan-unlock build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock [Rationale]  - The package lenovo-wwan-unlock is required in Ubuntu restricted for WWAN hardware support  - The package lenovo-wwan-unlock will generally be useful for a large part of    our user base  - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or    should go universe->main instead of this.  - It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the    package lenovo-fccunlock and lenovo-cfgservice in Ubuntu restricted, but there is no definitive deadline. [Security]  - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past  - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries  - Binary configservice_lenovo and DPR_Fcc_unlock_service in /opt/fcc_lenovo/ is no problem because AppArmor constraints applied  - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs    lenovo-fccunlock.service    lenovo-cfgservice.service  - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation    patterns are in place utilizing the following features:    AppArmor constraints had been included:    - opt.fcc_lenovo.DPR_Fcc_unlock_service    - opt.fcc_lenovo.configservice_lenovo - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Packages does not expose any external endpoints - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software    (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) [Quality assurance - function/usage]  - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance]  - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does    not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs    - https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock/issues  - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing]  - The package does not run a test at build time because it contains only binary files  - The package can not be well tested at build or autopkgtest time    because it will need real hardware for testing. To make up for that:    - We have access to such hardware in the team  - Based on that access outlined above, here are the details of the    test plan       execute service by systemd command    sudo systemctl start lenovo-fccunlock    sudo systemctl start lenovo-cfgservice    and (if already possible) example output of a test run:      - output of lenovo-fccunlock: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nsFBW3jXDk/   - output of lenovo-cfgservice: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8rCFqRHQ8V/    We will execute that test plan    on-uploads [Quality assurance - packaging]  - debian/watch is not present because it is a native package and need to add    AppArmor configs  - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field  - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors  - Please link to a recent build log of the package    https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/2.0.0-0ubuntu1  - Please attach the full output you have got from    `lintian --pedantic` log: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Mm6CX7QgFc/  - Lintian overrides are not present  - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.  - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies  - The package will not be installed by default  - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules    https://git.launchpad.net/~dirksu/+git/lenovo-fccunlock-sar/tree/debian/control [UI standards]  - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies]  - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main [Standards compliance]  - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner]  - The owning team will be canonical-mainstream and I have their acknowledgement for    that commitment  - The future owning team is already subscribed to the package  - This does not use static builds  - This does not use vendored code  - This package is not rust based - The package was test rebuilt in PPA or sbuild recently   PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dirksu/+archive/ubuntu/fccunlock-test [Background information]  The Package description explains the package well  Upstream Name is lenovo-wwan-unlock  Link to upstream project https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock
2024-06-28 16:08:46 Jeremy Bícha description [Availability] The package lenovo-wwan-unlock build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock [Rationale]  - The package lenovo-wwan-unlock is required in Ubuntu restricted for WWAN hardware support  - The package lenovo-wwan-unlock will generally be useful for a large part of    our user base  - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or    should go universe->main instead of this.  - It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the    package lenovo-fccunlock and lenovo-cfgservice in Ubuntu restricted, but there is no definitive deadline. [Security]  - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past  - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries  - Binary configservice_lenovo and DPR_Fcc_unlock_service in /opt/fcc_lenovo/ is no problem because AppArmor constraints applied  - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs    lenovo-fccunlock.service    lenovo-cfgservice.service  - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation    patterns are in place utilizing the following features:    AppArmor constraints had been included:    - opt.fcc_lenovo.DPR_Fcc_unlock_service    - opt.fcc_lenovo.configservice_lenovo - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Packages does not expose any external endpoints - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software    (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) [Quality assurance - function/usage]  - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance]  - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does    not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs    - https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock/issues  - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing]  - The package does not run a test at build time because it contains only binary files  - The package can not be well tested at build or autopkgtest time    because it will need real hardware for testing. To make up for that:    - We have access to such hardware in the team  - Based on that access outlined above, here are the details of the    test plan       execute service by systemd command    sudo systemctl start lenovo-fccunlock    sudo systemctl start lenovo-cfgservice    and (if already possible) example output of a test run:      - output of lenovo-fccunlock: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nsFBW3jXDk/   - output of lenovo-cfgservice: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8rCFqRHQ8V/    We will execute that test plan    on-uploads [Quality assurance - packaging]  - debian/watch is not present because it is a native package and need to add    AppArmor configs  - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field  - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors  - Please link to a recent build log of the package    https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/2.0.0-0ubuntu1  - Please attach the full output you have got from    `lintian --pedantic` log: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Mm6CX7QgFc/  - Lintian overrides are not present  - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.  - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies  - The package will not be installed by default  - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules    https://git.launchpad.net/~dirksu/+git/lenovo-fccunlock-sar/tree/debian/control [UI standards]  - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies]  - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main [Standards compliance]  - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner]  - The owning team will be canonical-mainstream and I have their acknowledgement for    that commitment  - The future owning team is already subscribed to the package  - This does not use static builds  - This does not use vendored code  - This package is not rust based - The package was test rebuilt in PPA or sbuild recently   PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dirksu/+archive/ubuntu/fccunlock-test [Background information]  The Package description explains the package well  Upstream Name is lenovo-wwan-unlock  Link to upstream project https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock [Availability] The package lenovo-wwan-unlock build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock [Rationale]  - The package lenovo-wwan-unlock is required in Ubuntu restricted for WWAN hardware support  - The package lenovo-wwan-unlock will generally be useful for a large part of    our user base  - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or    should go universe->main instead of this.  - It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the    package lenovo-fccunlock and lenovo-cfgservice in Ubuntu restricted, but there is no definitive deadline. [Security]  - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past  - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries  - Binary configservice_lenovo and DPR_Fcc_unlock_service in /opt/fcc_lenovo/ is no problem because AppArmor constraints applied  - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs    lenovo-fccunlock.service    lenovo-cfgservice.service  - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation    patterns are in place utilizing the following features:    AppArmor constraints had been included:    - opt.fcc_lenovo.DPR_Fcc_unlock_service    - opt.fcc_lenovo.configservice_lenovo - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Packages does not expose any external endpoints - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software    (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) [Quality assurance - function/usage]  - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance]  - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does    not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs    - https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock/issues  - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing]  - The package does not run a test at build time because it contains only binary files  - The package can not be well tested at build or autopkgtest time    because it will need real hardware for testing. To make up for that:    - We have access to such hardware in the team  - Based on that access outlined above, here are the details of the    test plan       execute service by systemd command    sudo systemctl start lenovo-fccunlock    sudo systemctl start lenovo-cfgservice    and (if already possible) example output of a test run:      - output of lenovo-fccunlock: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nsFBW3jXDk/   - output of lenovo-cfgservice: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8rCFqRHQ8V/    We will execute that test plan    on-uploads [Quality assurance - packaging]  - debian/watch is not present because it is a native package and need to add    AppArmor configs  - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field  - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors  - Please link to a recent build log of the package    https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/2.0.0-0ubuntu1  - Please attach the full output you have got from    `lintian --pedantic` log: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Mm6CX7QgFc/  - Lintian overrides are not present  - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.  - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies  - The package will not be installed by default  - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules    https://git.launchpad.net/~dirksu/+git/lenovo-fccunlock-sar/tree/debian/control [UI standards]  - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies]  - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main [Standards compliance]  - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner]  - The owning team will be canonical-mainstream and I have their acknowledgement for    that commitment  - The future owning team is already subscribed to the package  - This does not use static builds  - This does not use vendored code  - This package is not rust based - The package was test rebuilt in PPA or sbuild recently   PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dirksu/+archive/ubuntu/fccunlock-test [Background information]  The Package description explains the package well  Upstream Name is lenovo-wwan-unlock  Link to upstream project https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock The package is in multiverse so this is a request for promotion to 'restricted' instead of to main.
2024-07-02 14:45:15 Didier Roche-Tolomelli lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): assignee Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)
2024-07-03 00:39:17 Dirk Su oem-priority: importance Undecided Critical
2024-07-05 10:42:29 Didier Roche-Tolomelli lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): assignee Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) Canonical Security Team (canonical-security)
2024-07-05 10:42:59 Didier Roche-Tolomelli bug added subscriber Didier Roche-Tolomelli
2024-07-15 19:23:17 Mark Esler lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu): assignee Canonical Security Team (canonical-security) Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security)
2024-07-15 21:59:01 Steve Beattie tags oem-priority originate-from-1956804 sutton oem-priority originate-from-1956804 sec-4736 sutton