Activity log for bug #139776

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2007-09-15 12:04:39 Nikolaus Rath bug added bug
2008-10-23 21:49:34 Daniel T Chen latexmk: status New Incomplete
2008-10-23 21:49:34 Daniel T Chen latexmk: statusexplanation Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10 RC or later?
2008-12-19 20:00:14 Pedro Villavicencio latexmk: status Incomplete Invalid
2008-12-19 20:00:14 Pedro Villavicencio latexmk: statusexplanation Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10 RC or later?
2008-12-19 22:11:30 Nikolaus Rath latexmk: status Invalid New
2008-12-19 22:11:30 Nikolaus Rath latexmk: statusexplanation There is no information missing here. Whether the bug is still present can trivially be checked by everybody, there is no need to ask the original reporter for it. All it takes is to execute the two lines $ touch "long file name.tex" $ latexmk "long file name.tex" and one can immediately see that the bug is still present. At least in hardy. I am sorry if I am a bit grunty, but I am really getting disappointed about this. It seems more and more common that the only answer that bug reporters get as a response to their efforts is a periodic "please confirm that the bug still exists". If at least someone would do something about the bug after such a question I would not complain, but usually there is nothing happening at all. This is just a waste of the bug reporter's time, especially if the bug can be extremely trivially reproduced with a minimum of effort.
2009-08-08 23:07:42 Mark Harrison latexmk (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2019-03-21 09:05:24 Mark Harrison latexmk (Ubuntu): status Confirmed Fix Released