provide all dictionaries available for hunspell

Bug #268953 reported by Henrique Ferreiro
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
language-selector (Ubuntu)
Triaged
Medium
Unassigned
libreoffice-dictionaries (Ubuntu)
In Progress
Medium
Mattia Rizzolo

Bug Description

They are all available here: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries

Ubuntu only provides a few. All of them should be available.

Revision history for this message
Felipe Venegas (fvenegas) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage . I have classified this bug as a bug in openoffice.org-dictionaries.

Revision history for this message
Henrique Ferreiro (henrique-ferreiro) wrote :

Sorry. I was referring to the individual packages as hunspell-en-us or hunspell-ar.

Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

*** This is an automated message ***

This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug reports specification, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs-packaging bug reports have Wishlist importance. Subsequently, I'm setting this bug's status to Wishlist.

Changed in openoffice.org-dictionaries:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Changed in openoffice.org-dictionaries (Ubuntu):
status: New → Won't Fix
Changed in libreoffice-dictionaries (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) wrote : Re: [needs-packaging] provide all dictionaries available for hunspell

I've done this in debian, packaging the whole libreoffice-dictionaries, which provides quite some dictionaries (45 atm).

I'm now working on getting the ubuntu package in sync.

Changed in libreoffice-dictionaries (Ubuntu):
status: New → In Progress
assignee: nobody → Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
Revision history for this message
Akerbeltz (fios) wrote :

How are we going to handle locales for which there is more than one? For example, for gd, there's a smaller, unmaintained one and a bigger, maintained one. I mean, the choice is obvious but there needs to be a process of some sort to select amongst multiple dictionaries. I think en-GB similarly has a fork where someone has started maintaining again but I think only over on the LibreOffice extension site.

Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote :

@Akerbeltz: If you by "smaller" mean the myspell-gd package, it should be automatically uninstalled when you install hunspell-gd (since myspell-gd is included in the "Conflicts" field in debian/control).

Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote :

Adding a language-selector task to this bug report, since this will trigger changes to
/usr/share/language-selector/data/pkg_depends.

Revision history for this message
Akerbeltz (fios) wrote :

No, I mean that for gd, there is this one
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/scottish-gaelic-dictionary

and this one
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/faclair-afb

They're both for the same locale. It's not an uncommon scenario.

Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote :

libreoffice-dictionaries in Debian, which is about to make it into Ubuntu, contains version 2.8 of the Scottish Gaelic spellchecker, which is the bigger, so the package maintainer has already made the choice. Or did I misunderstand you again? ;)

Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Akerbeltz (fios) wrote :

The bug description makes reference only to the OO extension site. But either way, whether we're talking LO or OO extention repos, the scenario remains that there may be more than one checker.

I may be misreading the bug slightly but it sounds like the idea is to provide the maximum number of hunspell dictionaries possible - which means we can't just rely on those which LO or OO bundle because not all spellcheckers are bundled with LO/OO, some devs prefer to just host them on the extension site and (presumably because it's easier to maintain) the version on the extension sites are often newer than those bundled with the product.

Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote :

Please note that this bug report is 7 years old. Since then Ubuntu has switched from OO to LO. The sync of the current libreoffice-dictionaries version in Debian will be considered a fix of this bug.

I can't tell if there is a particular mechanism in place to handle the possible conflict you mention. I imagine that if you for example download hunspell-gd from the LO site, you'd better uninstall the hunspell-gd package before installing the other spellchecker. To the extent this is an issue, it's not a new issue triggered by the fix of this bug.

In general, the Ubuntu distribution can't take responsibility for software which users download from external sites.

Revision history for this message
Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) wrote :

Exactly.
I strongly believe the bundle made by libreoffice-dictionaries is quite a good one, and I'm not the only one thinking that.
Now, if there are two dictionaries for the same language we'll probably going to just pick the one in LO-dicts, since that's way easier to handle from a downstream point of view, if you disagree I'd just forward you to the libreoffice bug tracker.
If there is a missing one and you can provide/link it I'd just ask to the LO people to get it in the bundle.

If a dictionary in the bundle gets outdated just ask them to update it. I've already sent them some requests, and they are always responsive and helpful.
From my point of view, feel free to use me as a proxy for those requests, using this (once I get this package synced) or Debian's bug trackers.

Do I miss something you're trying to point out? I'm all ears about suggestions on handling this thing.

Revision history for this message
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) wrote :

@Mattia: Great to see that someone takes the initiative to keep libreoffice-dictionaries up to date and in sync with Debian. Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

*** This is an automated message ***

This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug reports specification, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs-packaging bug reports have Wishlist importance. Subsequently, I'm setting this bug's status to Wishlist.

Changed in language-selector (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
summary: - [needs-packaging] provide all dictionaries available for hunspell
+ provide all dictionaries available for hunspell
Changed in libreoffice-dictionaries (Ubuntu):
importance: Wishlist → Medium
Changed in language-selector (Ubuntu):
importance: Wishlist → Medium
Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
tags: removed: needs-packaging
no longer affects: openoffice.org-dictionaries (Ubuntu)
Changed in language-selector (Ubuntu):
status: New → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Amr Ibrahim (amribrahim1987) wrote :

Please, sync the latest with Debian and merge the changes.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.