kubuntu-debug-installer fails to install debug symbols for kmail (dbgsym repo related?!)
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kubuntu-debug-installer (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Harald Sitter | ||
Lucid |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Harald Sitter |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: kubuntu-
I'm trying to install debug symbols for kmail, but it fails.
It apparently tries to install
kmail-dbgsym libqtgui4-dbgsym kdelibs5-dbg libqtcore4-dbgsym
(3 -dbgsym, 1 -dbg), but fails:
"The following packages block the installation: kdelibs5-dbg"
When manually apt-get installing this list, I get:
$ LANG=C sudo apt-get install kmail-dbgsym libqtgui4-dbgsym kdelibs5-dbg libqtcore4-dbgsym
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kdelibs5-dbg: Depends: libqt4-dbg (>= 4.4.3) but it is not going to be installed
Then, adding it:
$ LANG=C sudo apt-get install kmail-dbgsym libqtgui4-dbgsym kdelibs5-dbg libqtcore4-dbgsym libqt4-dbg
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libqtcore4-
libqtgui4-dbgsym: Conflicts: libqt4-dbg but 4:4.6.2-0ubuntu2 is to be installed
I guess kubuntu-
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Mar 17 21:01:01 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
NonfreeKernelMo
Package: kubuntu-
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSign
SourcePackage: kubuntu-
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic i686
Changed in kubuntu-debug-installer (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Harald Sitter (apachelogger) |
importance: | Medium → Low |
milestone: | none → ubuntu-10.04 |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
tags: | added: kubuntu |
This bug was fixed in the package kubuntu- debug-installer - 10.04ubuntu4
--------------- debug-installer (10.04ubuntu4) lucid; urgency=low
kubuntu-
* Don't offer installation of already installed packages (LP: #538543)
* Changer lookup order (dbgsym first, dbg last). This way the user does not
end up with a mixed setup of dbgsym and dbg. Of course this only works if
the user does not install -dbg manually! Unfortunately a more specific
approach wil have to wait for libqapt or the likes, since the current
query design would make the lookups too expensive (LP: #540505)
-- Harald Sitter <email address hidden> Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:23:51 +0200