[MIR] khronos-opencl-clhpp

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Availability:
- Already in universe and available on arch:all.

Rationale:
- needed by khronos-opencl-headers, upstream split headers into a separate project.

Security:

- not applicable

Quality assurance:
- just a package split

UI standards:
Not applicable.

Dependencies:
- satisfied

Standards compliance:

- meets standards, in fact it was already in main

Maintenance:
Simple package, low maintenance effort, and maintained well in Debian.

Background information:
Needed to make khronos-opencl-headers migrate.

[Michael Terry (mterry)]

I get that this is just a package split, so the content is the same and doesn't need the same rigorous check. But still, a few questions:

- Tests are disabled, and then some compile tests in debian/t/ are run instead. The debian tests look more like "does this compile" rather than unit tests. Which is useful... But why not also the upstream tests?

- Needs a team bug subscriber. Probably ubuntu-x-swat like khronos-opencl-headers uses.

[Gianfranco Costamagna (costamagnagianfranco)]

Hi Michael

>I get that this is just a package split, so the content is the same and doesn't need the same >rigorous check. But still, a few questions:

please don't take this assumption as granted,
$ pull-debian-source khronos-opencl-headers 2.0~svn32091-2
$ pull-debian-source khronos-opencl-clhpp
$ cd khronos-opencl-headers-2.0~svn32091
$ meld cl2.hpp ../khronos-opencl-clhpp-2.0.10/input_cl2.hpp

they look mostly the same, except for some bug fixes

>- Tests are disabled, and then some compile tests in debian/t/ are run instead. The debian tests >look more like "does this compile" rather than unit tests. Which is useful... But why not also the >upstream tests?

they need some file that is not included in the tarball neither in the upstream git repo
    ${CMOCK_DIR}/src/cmock.c

this file is missing and a cmake .. with tests enabled just simply fails

>- Needs a team bug subscriber. Probably ubuntu-x-swat like khronos-opencl-headers uses.

not sure I can do this one, can you please add them or whoever you prefer?

thanks!

[Michael Terry (mterry)]

>>- Needs a team bug subscriber. Probably ubuntu-x-swat like khronos-opencl-headers uses.
>
> not sure I can do this one, can you please add them or whoever you prefer?

I can't do it either, I'm not a maintainer for that team. Chase down a maintainer and get them to subscribe the package.

[Gianfranco Costamagna (costamagnagianfranco)]

I pinged Ubuntu-x-swat team over irc and subscribed it to this bug :)

[Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)]

ubuntu-x subscribed to bugs now

[Matthias Klose (doko)]

Override component to main
khronos-opencl-clhpp 2.0.10-1 in zesty: universe/misc -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.0.10-1 in zesty amd64: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.0.10-1 in zesty arm64: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.0.10-1 in zesty armhf: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.0.10-1 in zesty i386: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.0.10-1 in zesty powerpc: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.0.10-1 in zesty ppc64el: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.0.10-1 in zesty s390x: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.0.10-1 in zesty amd64: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.0.10-1 in zesty arm64: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.0.10-1 in zesty armhf: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.0.10-1 in zesty i386: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.0.10-1 in zesty powerpc: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.0.10-1 in zesty ppc64el: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.0.10-1 in zesty s390x: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
15 publications overridden.

[Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer)]

Hi didrocks/seb128 - this shows up in component mismatches.
We were wondering if ubuntu-x really still is an active team or if the desktop-team would today be better to take this over?

Since it was approved in the past once the owner is sorted out this could be re-promoted.

[Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)]

FYI, this has been escalated through management to get the kernel team subscribing to it. Pending for an answer.

[Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)]

khronos-opencl-clhpp 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy: universe/misc -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy amd64: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy arm64: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy armhf: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy i386: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy ppc64el: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy riscv64: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy s390x: universe/libdevel/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy amd64: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy arm64: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy armhf: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy i386: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy ppc64el: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy riscv64: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
opencl-clhpp-headers-doc 2.2.0~~2.0.11+git9-g0192662-1 in groovy s390x: universe/doc/extra/100% -> main
Override [y|N]? y
15 publications overridden.