keystone package has incorrect dep on python-keystone (= 2012.1-0ubuntu1)

Bug #1073273 reported by Justin Shepherd on 2012-10-30
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
keystone (Ubuntu)
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04 LTS"

Using the following package repo:

# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/folsom-source.list
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/openstack-ubuntu-testing/folsom-trunk-testing/ubuntu precise main

 dpkg -l keystone
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-============================================-============================================-========================================================================================================
ii keystone 2012.2+git201209252030~precise-0ubuntu1 OpenStack identity service - Daemons

 apt-cache show keystone | grep -i depends
Depends: python, debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, upstart-job, python-keystone (= 2012.2+git201209252030~precise-0ubuntu1), adduser, ssl-cert (>= 1.0.12), dbconfig-common
Depends: python, debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, upstart-job, python-keystone (= 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.2), adduser, ssl-cert (>= 1.0.12), dbconfig-common
Depends: python, debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, upstart-job, python-keystone (= 2012.1-0ubuntu1), adduser, ssl-cert (>= 1.0.12), dbconfig-common

This will allow an upgrade to the keystone package with the incorrect python-keystone and python-keystoneclient packages

Related branches

Adam Gandelman (gandelman-a) wrote :

Hi Justin, thanks for the bug. It looks like the dependency between keystone and python-keystone is explicit in that it requires the same version, so those should be upgraded together. The python-keystoneclient dependency is loosely defined, for sure. Can you confirm that this is the case?

Also, please note that the folsom-trunk-testing PPA will be deprecated and eventually renamed folsom-stable-testing as we open the PPAs and build jobs for Grizzly. I'd advise using the Ubuntu Cloud archive for your testing at this point. http://www.ubuntu.com/download/help/cloud-archive-instructions

Justin Shepherd (jshepher) wrote :

I have been using the folsom-trunk-testing PPA as I thought those packages would eventually make their way into the Ubuntu Cloud archive.

And yes.. it seems that the keystone, python-keystone, python-keystoneclient packages all have to be upgraded together as a unit.

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package keystone - 2013.1~g1~20121101.2629-0ubuntu1

---------------
keystone (2013.1~g1~20121101.2629-0ubuntu1) raring; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/tests/test_overrides.conf: Update for Grizzly test suite.
  * debian/control: Drop python-nova.
 -- Adam Gandelman <email address hidden> Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:48:49 +0100

Changed in keystone (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released

Hello Justin, or anyone else affected,

Accepted keystone into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/2012.2.1-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

tags: added: verification-needed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers