Comment 38 for bug 1267393

Revision history for this message
Mark Ramm (mark-ramm) wrote : Re: [MIR] juju-core, juju-mongodb, gccgo-go, gccgo-4.9, golang

@jamie

"However, I don't feel the download size is itself a blocker. We can perform uploads for everything at first, figure out how to be smarter/more selective later and along the way work with upstream on dynamic linking if that makes sense."

I think that is particularly true in *this* case where we are talking just about Juju Core. Of course as a standard policy, for a future where there may be many go applications in the distro, I think we really do want either golang-go or gcc-go with dynamic linking to be moved into a supportable state. And I also agree that we should not confuse the current case (1 app) with the future.