jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service()

Bug #832365 reported by Igor Lemos
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
jockey (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

apareceu quando cliquei em additional Drivers.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: jockey-common 0.9.4-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-9.13-generic 3.0.3
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-9-generic i686
.var.log.jockey.log:

Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Aug 23 18:08:39 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/jockey/jockey-backend
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Alpha i386 (20110803.1)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. G31M-S2L
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/jockey/jockey-backend --debug -l /var/log/jockey.log
ProcEnviron:

ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-9-generic root=UUID=9aba2ce3-87f8-4db0-954b-8059923ad84a ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/jockey/jockey-backend', '--debug', '-l', '/var/log/jockey.log']
SourcePackage: jockey
Title: jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-08-23 (0 days ago)
UserGroups:

dmi.bios.date: 01/02/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc.
dmi.bios.version: F4
dmi.board.name: G31M-S2L
dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrF4:bd01/02/2008:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnG31M-S2L:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnG31M-S2L:rvr:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr:
dmi.product.name: G31M-S2L
dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.

Revision history for this message
Igor Lemos (l88os) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #831754, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
visibility: private → public
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.