Hi Timo, can you update the bug description with the SRU template? Also I'd like to know why removing the abort() call makes sense, because in the 1.7-1 version that call is still present. Is the abort() call the right way to handle that code path?
Thanks,
Hi Timo, can you update the bug description with the SRU template? Also I'd like to know why removing the abort() call makes sense, because in the 1.7-1 version that call is still present. Is the abort() call the right way to handle that code path?
Thanks,