| 2015-11-18 04:17:50 |
Flames_in_Paradise |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2015-11-18 04:22:34 |
Flames_in_Paradise |
tags |
|
wishlist xenial |
|
| 2015-11-18 04:31:00 |
Flames_in_Paradise |
description |
Hello
shortlog:
If a new user installs ubuntu and as post-installation task runs the available updates there is big chance he'll be getting a new Kernel tool – this means that the initRAMFS will be updated.
Depending on the Hardware equipment, this can be a rather timely + CPU consuming process.
The chance to believe the PC stalls is at high risk w/o visual feedback.
If the electricty or internet-connection fails to work - and the process was interupted, the system will call for a
$ E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem
If the user does so, he gets no visul feedback in terms of a progressbar - this could be possible!
Remember the Knoppix CD, where the boot-process in itself is visible?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsFmMFwScU @ 5min11sec
It can build trust to see that a process is evolving - even the Redomond-guys respect this with W10 - giving a feedback to the user - not just a blinking cursor.
Thinking this would not be to timely to implement.
Thanks for making Ubuntu better every day! |
Hello
shortlog:
If a new user installs ubuntu and as post-installation task runs the available updates he certainly gets a new Kernel too – this means that the initRAMFS will be updated.
Depending on the Hardware equipment, this can be a rather timely + CPU consuming process.
The chance to believe the PC stalls is at high risk w/o visual feedback.
If the electricty or internet-connection fails to work - and the process was interupted, the system will call for a
$ E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem
If the user does so, he gets no visul feedback in terms of a progressbar - this could be possible in the terminal!
Remember the Knoppix CD, where the boot-process in itself is visible?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsFmMFwScU @ 5min11sec the progress bar in question is visible.
It can build trust to see that a process is evolving - even the Redmond-guys respect this - still with W10 - giving a feedback to the user - not just a blinking cursor.
Thinking this would not be to timely to implement.
Thanks for making Ubuntu better every day! |
|
| 2015-11-18 04:31:51 |
Flames_in_Paradise |
summary |
Visibility of update progress during "update-initramfs" not given |
Visibility of progress during "update-initramfs" not given |
|
| 2015-11-18 04:32:58 |
Flames_in_Paradise |
description |
Hello
shortlog:
If a new user installs ubuntu and as post-installation task runs the available updates he certainly gets a new Kernel too – this means that the initRAMFS will be updated.
Depending on the Hardware equipment, this can be a rather timely + CPU consuming process.
The chance to believe the PC stalls is at high risk w/o visual feedback.
If the electricty or internet-connection fails to work - and the process was interupted, the system will call for a
$ E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem
If the user does so, he gets no visul feedback in terms of a progressbar - this could be possible in the terminal!
Remember the Knoppix CD, where the boot-process in itself is visible?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsFmMFwScU @ 5min11sec the progress bar in question is visible.
It can build trust to see that a process is evolving - even the Redmond-guys respect this - still with W10 - giving a feedback to the user - not just a blinking cursor.
Thinking this would not be to timely to implement.
Thanks for making Ubuntu better every day! |
Hello
shortlog:
If a new user installs ubuntu and as post-installation task runs the available updates he certainly gets a new Kernel too – this means that the initRAMFS will be updated.
Depending on the Hardware equipment, this can be a rather timely + CPU consuming process.
The chance to believe the PC stalls is at high risk w/o visual feedback.
If the electricty or internet-connection fails to work - and the process was interupted, the system will call for a
$ E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem
If the user does so, he gets no visul feedback in terms of a progressbar - this could be possible in the terminal!
Remember the Knoppix CD, where the boot-process in itself is visible?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsFmMFwScU @ 5min11sec the progress bar in question is visible.
It can build trust to see that a process is evolving - even the Redmond-guys respect this - still with W10 - giving a visual feedback to the user - not just a blinking cursor.
Thinking this would not be to timely to implement.
Thanks for making Ubuntu better every day! |
|
| 2015-11-18 04:35:41 |
Flames_in_Paradise |
description |
Hello
shortlog:
If a new user installs ubuntu and as post-installation task runs the available updates he certainly gets a new Kernel too – this means that the initRAMFS will be updated.
Depending on the Hardware equipment, this can be a rather timely + CPU consuming process.
The chance to believe the PC stalls is at high risk w/o visual feedback.
If the electricty or internet-connection fails to work - and the process was interupted, the system will call for a
$ E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem
If the user does so, he gets no visul feedback in terms of a progressbar - this could be possible in the terminal!
Remember the Knoppix CD, where the boot-process in itself is visible?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsFmMFwScU @ 5min11sec the progress bar in question is visible.
It can build trust to see that a process is evolving - even the Redmond-guys respect this - still with W10 - giving a visual feedback to the user - not just a blinking cursor.
Thinking this would not be to timely to implement.
Thanks for making Ubuntu better every day! |
Hello
shortlog:
If a new user installs ubuntu and as post-installation task runs the available updates he certainly gets a new Kernel too – this means that the initRAMFS will be updated.
Depending on the Hardware equipment, this can be a rather timely + CPU consuming process.
The chance to believe the PC stalls is at high risk w/o visual feedback.
If the electricty or internet-connection fails to work - and the process was interupted, the system will call for a
$ E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem
If the user does so, he gets no visul feedback in terms of a progressbar - this could be possible in the terminal!
Remember the Knoppix CD, where the boot-process in itself was visible?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsFmMFwScU @ 5min11sec the progress bar in question is visible. (Source: Semper-Video - Knoppix Tettungs-CD, 2008/07)
It can build trust to see that a process is evolving - even the Redmond-guys respect this - still with W10 - giving a visual feedback to the user - not just a blinking cursor.
Thinking this would not be to timely to implement.
Thanks for making Ubuntu better every day! |
|
| 2015-11-18 04:36:29 |
Flames_in_Paradise |
description |
Hello
shortlog:
If a new user installs ubuntu and as post-installation task runs the available updates he certainly gets a new Kernel too – this means that the initRAMFS will be updated.
Depending on the Hardware equipment, this can be a rather timely + CPU consuming process.
The chance to believe the PC stalls is at high risk w/o visual feedback.
If the electricty or internet-connection fails to work - and the process was interupted, the system will call for a
$ E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem
If the user does so, he gets no visul feedback in terms of a progressbar - this could be possible in the terminal!
Remember the Knoppix CD, where the boot-process in itself was visible?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsFmMFwScU @ 5min11sec the progress bar in question is visible. (Source: Semper-Video - Knoppix Tettungs-CD, 2008/07)
It can build trust to see that a process is evolving - even the Redmond-guys respect this - still with W10 - giving a visual feedback to the user - not just a blinking cursor.
Thinking this would not be to timely to implement.
Thanks for making Ubuntu better every day! |
Hello
shortlog:
If a new user installs ubuntu and as post-installation task runs the available updates he certainly gets a new Kernel too – this means that the initRAMFS will be updated.
Depending on the Hardware equipment, this can be a rather timely + CPU consuming process.
The chance to believe the PC stalls is at high risk w/o visual feedback.
If the electricty or internet-connection fails to work - and the process was interupted, the system will call for a
$ E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem
If the user does so, he gets no visul feedback in terms of a progressbar - this could be possible in the terminal!
Remember the Knoppix CD, where the boot-process in itself was visible?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPsFmMFwScU @ 5min11sec the progress bar in question is visible. (Source: Semper-Video - Knoppix Rettungs-CD, 2008/07)
It can build trust to see that a process is evolving - even the Redmond-guys respect this - still with W10 - giving a visual feedback to the user - not just a blinking cursor.
Thinking this would not be to timely to implement.
Thanks for making Ubuntu better every day! |
|
| 2015-11-18 15:37:44 |
Launchpad Janitor |
initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2015-11-18 15:38:07 |
Germar |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Germar |
| 2015-11-20 15:56:08 |
Flames_in_Paradise |
tags |
wishlist xenial |
accessibility wishlist xenial |
|
| 2015-11-27 21:47:08 |
Flames_in_Paradise |
attachment added |
|
Knoppix-progressbar during boot-process in virtual terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core/+bug/1517305/+attachment/4526463/+files/Lin_Knoppix-boot_Pacz1.png |
|
| 2015-12-11 11:47:12 |
Alberto Salvia Novella |
initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core (Ubuntu): importance |
Undecided |
Low |
|
| 2016-03-02 12:26:19 |
Oliver Grawert |
affects |
initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core (Ubuntu) |
initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) |
|
