Comment 15 for bug 619816

Revision history for this message
Maxim Levitsky (maximlevitsky) wrote : Re: [Bug 619816] Re: Battery status line too long

On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 23:38 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> OK. Those are good detailed reports. Is there a bug open for each of
> them? We're going to nail g-p-m issues in 11.10, we know that's a bit of
> a swamp and have a plan to ask a contractor to help drain it in the next
> round. If you're interested, let me know, otherwise good bug reports
> would be most useful and will get addressed.
>
> Mark
>

Yes, like I said I reported them all:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/144830
This bug is mostly fixed in 10.04, but only problem remaining is that
g-p-m doesn't update its properies window when I plug batter after
login.
Granted its not possible currently to tell if system has battery before
its plugged, but after it is g-p-m should update the properties window.
I discussed that on LKML, and more or less nothing came out of that.
We ended up with the decision that kernel need to present somehow a flag
to userspace that battery bay exists, but no battery present.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/496221
This bug deals with too low hibernate thresholds.
Its piece of cake to fix. All its needed is to make system hibernate as
soon as battery hits 5% (or to be safe 10%).
(And let user override that to lower value if user really fells like he
wants to).
Besides, it happened to me that due to natural LiION decay, battery
might die on as high as 10% percent. (but on next boot, the total amount
of energy it can store is reduced, so it doesn't happen again.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/616443
10.10 bug, maybe in my case a bit different.
I just see the battery status twice, in exact same way.
I am sure that some code adds it twice to indicator-applet.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-session/+bug/645370
This deals with forced screensaver on suspend.
To be honest, I didn't report that bug for long time, and today while
searching though g-p-m bugs I found this new report.

As a side note I also seen many more g-p-m issues, but they mostly are
kernel related unlike mine.

Also just a small note about the fact that due to variate of ways
brightness can be set from hardware keys, g-p-m often doesn't let
keyboard set the bightness (usually because it is set i hardware or
kernel acpi 'video' driver. As a result of this users with remote
controls that have brightness up/down keys can't use them.

I think these are all the bugs.

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky