indicator-application-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_unref()

Bug #704620 reported by Dennis van Dok
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
indicator-application (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: indicator-application

This happened on resume from sleep on my MacBook 2,1.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: indicator-application 0.2.9-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-25.43-generic 2.6.35.10
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-25-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jan 17 13:24:24 2011
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/indicator-application/indicator-application-service
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/indicator-application/indicator-application-service
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en
 LANG=nl_NL.utf8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x4041b5: cmpb $0x0,(%rbx)
 PC (0x004041b5) ok
 source "$0x0" ok
 destination "(%rbx)" (0x6f74616369646e69) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: indicator-application
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 g_object_unref (_object=<value optimized out>) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.26.1/gobject/gobject.c:2675
 ?? ()
 __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
Title: indicator-application-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_unref()
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare tape

Revision history for this message
Dennis van Dok (dvandok-gmail) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #637202, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.