indicator-application-service assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/indicator-application/indicator-application-service: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x09c64200 ***

Bug #652714 reported by Richard Cochius
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
indicator-application (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: indicator-application

don't know

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: indicator-application 0.2.9-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686
Architecture: i386
AssertionMessage: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/indicator-application/indicator-application-service: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x09c64200 ***
CheckboxSubmission: 548a211fd1ced7f6cc48ceb534e974a4
CheckboxSystem: ed86e29ffba809c116a39e33fa9fc45c
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Fri Oct 1 07:10:16 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/indicator-application/indicator-application-service
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/indicator-application/indicator-application-service
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=de_DE.utf8
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: indicator-application
StacktraceTop:
 __kernel_vsyscall ()
 raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6
Title: indicator-application-service assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/indicator-application/indicator-application-service: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x09c64200 ***
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Richard Cochius (brightman63) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #640838, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.