indicator-application-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_enum_get_value()

Bug #649864 reported by Chen Liang
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
indicator-application (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: indicator-application

This happened when I update the latest patch on 28th Sep. My machine spec:

Dell INSPIRON 6400
Intel Pentium Dual-Core
2GB RAM
160GB Harddrive

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: indicator-application 0.2.9-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Sep 27 19:20:12 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/indicator-application/indicator-application-service
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Alpha i386 (20100803.1)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/indicator-application/indicator-application-service
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_IE.utf8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x804b8bc: cmpb $0x0,(%edi)
 PC (0x0804b8bc) ok
 source "$0x0" ok
 destination "(%edi)" (0x2c737265) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: indicator-application
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 g_enum_get_value () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
Title: indicator-application-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_enum_get_value()
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Chen Liang (chenliang) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #649540, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.