indi and libindi0 both contain /usr/bin/indiserver
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
indi (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
i've done a fresh install of karmic koala, when i try install kstars 4.3.2 with synaptic he tells me these: package libindi0 not installed failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir ?/usr/bin/
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Dec 7 01:38:42 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: intentando sobreescribir «/usr/bin/
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
NonfreeKernelMo
Package: libindi0 (not installed)
ProcVersionSign
SourcePackage: libindi
Title: package libindi0 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir «/usr/bin/
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic i686
affects: | libindi (Ubuntu) → indi (Ubuntu) |
summary: |
- package libindi0 not installed failed to install/upgrade: intentando - sobreescribir ?/usr/bin/indiserver?, que est? tambi?n en el paquete indi - 5:0.5-0ubuntu6 + indi and libindi0 both contain /usr/bin/indiserver |
Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation.
It looks like the package indi contains just an older version of INDI than libindi0 so you can remove the package indi. After that installing kstars should work.
Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better!
indi: de.archive. ubuntu. com karmic/universe Packages de.archive. ubuntu. com karmic/main Packages
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 5:0.5-0ubuntu6
Version table:
5:0.5-0ubuntu6 0
500 http://
libindi0:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 0.6-0ubuntu1
Version table:
0.6-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://
Are there any reasons to have indi in universe?