ImageMagick Font Issues
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Debian |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
imagemagick (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: libmagick9
Regarding one of our web servers, a co-worker of mine filed an internal
bug with this text:
> ImageMagick fonts don't get properly configured -- this seems like it
> may be a package bug to me, though I'm not sure.
> Basically /usr/lib/
> refers to type-ghostscrip
> installed (we don't have any Type 1 fonts installed). The ImageMagick
> examples page ( http://
> suggests using a script to enumerate fonts:
> http://
Our needing to edit a configuration file which is stored
in /usr/lib/
overwritten on upgrades, since it's not a conffile, right?
Changed in imagemagick: | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | Unconfirmed → Confirmed |
Changed in imagemagick (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Incomplete → Confirmed |
Changed in debian: | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Committed |
Changed in debian: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Perhaps this package should be using Defoma: "Defoma, which stands for DEbian FOnt MAnager, provides a framework for automatic font configuration. An application whose configuration of fonts usually requires manual intervention can automate the process through Defoma, by installing a Defoma- configuration script. The script gets called whenever a font is installed and removed, so that the script may update the application configuration."