On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 08:58, Matthew Garrett <email address hidden> wrote:
> It's a bug in the Linux support patch. It byteswaps a 32-bit value as it
> it's a 64-bit one and so ends up with zeros. This fixes the Fedora
> version, I'd guess it should be applicable to the Debian one.
Thank you very much for sending this patch. I will apply it in my
Debian tree and I hope that it will be integrated into Ubuntu. My
tree, BTW, is available at two places:
Hi, Matthew.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 08:58, Matthew Garrett <email address hidden> wrote:
> It's a bug in the Linux support patch. It byteswaps a 32-bit value as it
> it's a 64-bit one and so ends up with zeros. This fixes the Fedora
> version, I'd guess it should be applicable to the Debian one.
Thank you very much for sending this patch. I will apply it in my
Debian tree and I hope that it will be integrated into Ubuntu. My
tree, BTW, is available at two places:
https:/ /github. com/rbrito/ hfsprogs anonscm. debian. org/gitweb/ ?p=collab- maint/hfsprogs. git
http://
If you happen to have patches in Fedora, I would love to get them, to
ease the pain of maintaining this Frankenstein thing.
Thanks,
-- {ime.usp. br,gmail. com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA rb.doesntexist. org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms. berlios. de qa.debian. org/developer. php?login= rbrito% 40ime.usp. br
Rogério Brito : rbrito@
http://
DebianQA: http://