gwibber-service crashed with signal 5 in g_object_newv()

Bug #939467 reported by peter armstrong
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gwibber (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Crashed while trying to login to the Ubuntu Software Centre to review a program.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gwibber-service 3.3.6-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.92-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Feb 23 12:29:41 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gwibber-service
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120128)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/gwibber-service
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANGUAGE=en_IE:en
 LANG=en_IE.UTF-8
Signal: 5
SourcePackage: gwibber
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_newv () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_new_valist () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_new () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gwibber-service crashed with signal 5 in g_object_newv()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-18 (4 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
gwibber.log:
 2012-02-12 20:06:42,170 - Gwibber Service - INFO - Running from the system path
 2012-02-12 20:06:56,046 - Gwibber Accounts - INFO - Running from the system path
 2012-02-12 20:07:59,907 - Gwibber Dispatcher - INFO - Cleaning up database...

Revision history for this message
peter armstrong (peteretep) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #912628, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.