gwibber-service crashed with signal 5 in g_object_newv()

Bug #930794 reported by mjunker
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gwibber (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Ubuntu Version 12.04 (precise) (32-Bit) not stable
Kernel Linux 3.2.0-15-generic-pae
GNOME 3.3.5

Speicher: 2 GiB
CPU: Intel® Atom™ CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz × 2

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gwibber-service 3.3.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-15.24-generic-pae 3.2.5
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-15-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Feb 11 23:54:38 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gwibber-service
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/gwibber-service
Signal: 5
SourcePackage: gwibber
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_newv () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_new_valist () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_new () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gwibber-service crashed with signal 5 in g_object_newv()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-11 (0 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare scanner tape video
gwibber.log:
 2012-02-11 23:54:37,319 - Gwibber Service - INFO - Running from the system path
 2012-02-11 23:54:51,880 - Gwibber Service - INFO - Running from the system path
 2012-02-11 23:54:54,594 - Gwibber Service - INFO - Running from the system path
 2012-02-11 23:54:56,589 - Gwibber Service - INFO - Running from the system path

Revision history for this message
mjunker (markojunker) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #912628, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.