gwibber-service crashed with ServerNotFoundError in _conn_request()

[Steve Flynn]

Binary package hint: gwibber

Description: Ubuntu lucid (development branch)
Release: 10.04

Initial run of "Gwibber Social Accounts" so no other configuration performed since installation.

gwibber:
  Installed: 2.29.91-0ubuntu1
  Candidate: 2.29.91-0ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 2.29.91-0ubuntu1 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

First time I've ran Gwibber, so not sure what should happen. What did happen was a crash with the attached info, no other windows, no other output.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Mar 10 23:44:45 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gwibber-service
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: gwibber-service 2.29.91-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/gwibber-service
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/gwibber-service']
SourcePackage: gwibber
Title: gwibber-service crashed with ServerNotFoundError in _conn_request()
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev sambashare scanner video

[Pedro Villavicencio (pedro)]

Thanks for the report, is this still an issue with latest Gwibber on Lucid?

[Steve Flynn (anothermindbomb)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 18/03/10 14:16, Pedro Villavicencio wrote:
> Thanks for the report, is this still an issue with latest Gwibber on
> Lucid?
>

Just fired it back up again and it seems to be fine now. Permitting me
to configure it as normal.

- --
Steve Flynn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkuiaf4ACgkQpOzvLkUb86BFxACcD/sMlrOGr3Tf7w6Styknr1z/
t28AoJF+vDhqKHb+3NTIVSrf7B9PFBqu
=LW49
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Pedro Villavicencio (pedro)]

Thanks, marking this as fixed.