gwibber crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_reverse() (list=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)

Bug #382110 reported by Matt Zimmerman
20
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Gwibber
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
gwibber (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gwibber

I opened Gwibber, updated my Facebook account preferences to authorize it to receive status updates, read through a few pages of updates, then switched to another window to do something else. Some time later, I saw that Gwibber had crashed.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun May 31 11:00:07 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gwibber
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
Package: gwibber 0.9.2~bzr263-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/gwibber
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/zsh
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-6.7-generic
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gwibber
StacktraceTop:
 g_slist_reverse () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gwibber crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_reverse()
Uname: Linux 2.6.30-6-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fuse kvm lpadmin plugdev sambashare video
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7fe1f0d769d3 <g_slist_reverse+19>: mov 0x8(%rdi),%rax
 PC (0x7fe1f0d769d3) ok
 source "0x8(%rdi)" (0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaab2) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Stacktrace.txt (retraced)

StacktraceTop:IA__g_slist_reverse (list=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
pango_layout_check_lines (layout=0x3973b30)
pango_layout_get_extents_internal (
gtk_label_size_request (widget=0x2ef7060,
IA__g_closure_invoke (closure=0x26e7af0,

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : ThreadStacktrace.txt (retraced)
Changed in gwibber (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
Matt Zimmerman (mdz)
summary: gwibber crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_reverse()
+ (list=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
Revision history for this message
Alexander Sack (asac) wrote :

sending ubuntu gwibber crashes upstream. If gwibber devs want us to just close them instead let me know (through identi.ca ;)?

Changed in gwibber (Ubuntu):
status: New → Triaged
Alexander Sack (asac)
visibility: private → public
Kees Cook (kees)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Omer Akram (om26er) wrote :

we are wondering if this is still an issue for you. can you please update to latest version of gwibber in karmic the bug you reported was against a development release. Have you faced this with gwibber 2.0

Changed in gwibber (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : Re: [Bug 382110] Re: gwibber crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_reverse() (list=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:45:41AM -0000, Omer Akram wrote:
> we are wondering if this is still an issue for you. can you please
> update to latest version of gwibber in karmic the bug you reported was
> against a development release. Have you faced this with gwibber 2.0

I haven't seen this with 2.0.

--
 - mdz

Revision history for this message
Omer Akram (om26er) wrote :

marking this fixed as per last comment

Changed in gwibber (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Fix Released
Changed in gwibber:
status: New → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.