gvfsd-archive crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

Bug #980757 reported by Remi Meier
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Double clicking on an ISO file on a Samba network location causes this crash.
This does not happen for all ISOs but it happens consistently with the "ubuntu-9.04-desktop-i386.iso".

Expected behavior:
ISO file gets mounted and can be browsed with nautilus.

What happened:
Mount point shows up for <1s then disappears again from nautilus.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gvfs-backends 1.12.0-0ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-22.35-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: 38b068642c7ad9803bf2d827a5c6cd69
CheckboxSystem: bb422ca46d02494cdbc459927a98bc2f
Date: Fri Apr 13 14:01:19 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-archive
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-archive file=/home/username/.gvfs/data\ on\ docking/Software/ubuntu-9.04-desktop-i386.iso
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 g_assertion_message () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_assertion_message_expr () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
Title: gvfsd-archive crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-03 (9 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare vboxusers

Revision history for this message
Remi Meier (remi-meier) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #821018, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.