gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #1750751 reported by Michael Thayer
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #1706097: gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV. Edit Remove
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This was reported by Apport. I did not notice anything amiss, so I am just passing it on. (Perhaps you should add an option into Apport: "I did not notice anything wrong."

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: gvfs-backends 1.34.1-2ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-32.35-generic 4.13.13
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-32-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.8-0ubuntu10
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Feb 13 16:56:18 2018
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-mtp
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-24 (119 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171018)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-mtp --spawner :1.15 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/14
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f92063935a9: mov 0x18(%rax),%rax
 PC (0x7f92063935a9) ok
 source "0x18(%rax)" (0x00000018) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gvfs/libgvfsdaemon.so
 g_task_return_now (task=0x565512fff9e0 [GTask]) at ../../../../gio/gtask.c:1145
 g_task_return (task=0x565512fff9e0 [GTask], type=<optimized out>) at ../../../../gio/gtask.c:1203
 init_second_async_cb (source_object=<optimized out>, res=<optimized out>, user_data=0x565512fff9e0) at ../../../../gio/gdbusproxy.c:1808
 g_task_return_now (task=0x565512fffab0 [GTask]) at ../../../../gio/gtask.c:1145
Title: gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-02-06 (14 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers

Revision history for this message
Michael Thayer (michael-thayer) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1706097, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.