gvfs-afc-volume-monitor assert failure: gvfs-afc-volume-monitor: plist.c:194: plist_copy_node: Zusicherung »data« nicht erfüllt.

Bug #1371930 reported by haug
170
This bug affects 23 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
Expired
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

as I plug in the i-phone, the mistake appears.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: gvfs-backends 1.20.2-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-16.22-generic 3.16.2
Uname: Linux 3.16.0-16-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
AssertionMessage: gvfs-afc-volume-monitor: plist.c:194: plist_copy_node: Zusicherung »data« nicht erfüllt.
CrashCounter: 1
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Sat Sep 20 17:03:59 2014
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-afc-volume-monitor
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-06-09 (468 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release i386 (20130424)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-afc-volume-monitor
ProcEnviron:
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANGUAGE=de_DE
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 __assert_fail_base (fmt=0xb58b1fea <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xb58b1fea>, assertion=assertion@entry=0xb7779aa1 "data", file=file@entry=0xb7779ac9 "plist.c", line=line@entry=194, function=function@entry=0xb7779dcb "plist_copy_node") at assert.c:92
 __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0xb7779aa1 "data", file=0xb7779ac9 "plist.c", line=194, function=0xb7779dcb "plist_copy_node") at assert.c:101
 ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libplist.so.2
 plist_copy () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libplist.so.2
 ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libimobiledevice.so.4
Title: gvfs-afc-volume-monitor assert failure: gvfs-afc-volume-monitor: plist.c:194: plist_copy_node: Zusicherung »data« nicht erfüllt.
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers

Revision history for this message
haug (josefa4) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1361011, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote :

Is this reproducible in Xenial or later?

Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Rolf Leggewie (r0lf)
Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for gvfs (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.