gvfsd-gphoto2 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_unref()

Bug #1217652 reported by Cristian Aravena Romero
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Connect Android and Crash.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: gvfs-backends 1.17.2-0ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-4.9-generic 3.11.0-rc7
Uname: Linux 3.11.0-4-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.12.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Aug 27 22:24:07 2013
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-gphoto2
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-07-31 (27 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Alpha amd64 (20130724)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-gphoto2 --spawner :1.9 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/1
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANGUAGE=es_CL:es
 LANG=es_CL.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7fa99ce09b84 <g_object_unref+20>: cmpq $0x50,(%rax)
 PC (0x7fa99ce09b84) ok
 source "$0x50" ok
 destination "(%rax)" (0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 g_object_unref () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 g_object_unref () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gvfs/libgvfsdaemon.so
Title: gvfsd-gphoto2 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_unref()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Cristian Aravena Romero (caravena) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1213555, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.