gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_unref() after "ejecting" device

Bug #1156467 reported by ariel cornejo
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

I experienced this right after "ejecting" my Samsung Galaxy S III in Nautilus (I had just copied a 733 MB file)

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: gvfs-backends 1.15.4-0ubuntu1b1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-12.21-generic 3.8.2
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-12-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Mar 18 01:54:40 2013
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-mtp
InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-05 (132 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release amd64 (20121017.5)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-mtp --spawner :1.11 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/7
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f73a37cb0bc: mov 0x20(%rax),%rax
 PC (0x7f73a37cb0bc) ok
 source "0x20(%rax)" (0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaca) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gvfs/libgvfsdaemon.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_unref () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_value_unset () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_unref()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-03-13 (5 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
ariel cornejo (arielco) wrote :
Revision history for this message
ariel cornejo (arielco) wrote :

Possibly related to #1130101 ?

information type: Private → Public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1149135, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.